26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED<br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

20229 Mr Malcolm Bleasdale [4941] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

20401 Ms Brenda Roberts [4600] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

21589 Ms Patricia Day [4605] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

19486 Mr & Mrs Wennell [4568] 1 Object<br />

Summary <strong>Site</strong> 223 has failed the Stage 2 <strong>Site</strong> Assessment, we feel however that the site has merit <strong>and</strong> we would wish it to be put forard for consideration as a<br />

contingency site.<br />

My clients propose if needed to include the whole <strong>of</strong> their existing curtilage within the site to be considered for c<strong>and</strong>idacy or as an alternative to that which<br />

they have already proposed. They propose to demolish their exisitng dwelling if successful <strong>and</strong> their existing access could be used in either case.<br />

Change Sought: <strong>Site</strong> 223 to be considered as a contingency site<br />

22045 P Roberts [4921] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

22049 Ms Rebecca Jones [4922] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

20225 Mrs Louise Rahil-Kirwin [4940] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

327

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!