26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Abergele Business Park<br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

19632 Mrs Pauline Sch<strong>of</strong>ield [1893] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18427 Mrs Rhiannon Lally [1387] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18372 Mr Gordon Leech [1963] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

19816 Mrs Glenda Holmes [1796] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

19544 Mrs Wendy Bainbridge [1971] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18317 Mrs Jacqueline Ann Nicholls [1911] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

17729 Mr Colin Masters [1949] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site.<br />

19797 Miss Charlotte Louise Sch<strong>of</strong>ield [1894] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

19424 Mr Ge<strong>of</strong>frey Hatcher [1800] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site.<br />

539

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!