Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES
4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Abergele Business Park
Rep No Name People Type
14379 Mr Peter Bolton [1040] 1 Object
Summary I object to the allocation of 850 homes in the Abergele area:
No evidence to justify a housing need of this proportion.
The allocation of greenfield sites.
The balance will tilt in favour of excessive development.
Will be at the expense of local housing needs.
The already burgeoning infrastructure.
Economic development is patchy with an over reliance on seasonal tourism and low paid jobs.
The current level of council tax, policy precent and water charges are now extremely high in return for basic services. The additional houses will serve to
exacerbate this very difficult situation.
Change Sought: Revise housing growth
17965 G Rothwell [2454] 1 Object
Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One of the themes of the LDP is to create jobs. The removal of this previously developed land site
from employment uses is illogical and sequentially unsustainable.
The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable and previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing
potential the effect of which would reduce the scale of new and windfall allocation for the town.
There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective
Change Sought: Deletion of site
17976 J Halliday [2495] 1 Object
Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One of the themes of the LDP is to create jobs. The removal of this previously developed land site
from employment uses is illogical and sequentially unsustainable.
The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable and previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing
potential the effect of which would reduce the scale of new and windfall allocation for the town.
There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective
Change Sought: Deletion of site
19325 Mrs Susan C Osborn [1468] 1 Object
Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One of the themes of the LDP is to create jobs. The removal of this previously developed land site
from employment uses is illogical and sequentially unsustainable.
The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable and previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing
potential the effect of which would reduce the scale of new and windfall allocation for the town.
There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective
Change Sought: Deletion of site.
17685 Mr Arfon Hughes [1746] 1 Object
Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One of the themes of the LDP is to create jobs. The removal of this previously developed land site
from employment uses is illogical and sequentially unsustainable.
The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable and previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing
potential the effect of which would reduce the scale of new and windfall allocation for the town.
There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective
Change Sought: Deletion of site.
17718 Mr Howard George Oliver [1929] 1 Object
Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One of the themes of the LDP is to create jobs. The removal of this previously developed land site
from employment uses is illogical and sequentially unsustainable.
The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable and previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing
potential the effect of which would reduce the scale of new and windfall allocation for the town.
There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective
Change Sought: Deletion of site.
19879 Mr Arthur Rodney Cannell [1464] 1 Object
Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One of the themes of the LDP is to create jobs. The removal of this previously developed land site
from employment uses is illogical and sequentially unsustainable.
The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable and previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing
potential the effect of which would reduce the scale of new and windfall allocation for the town.
There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective
Change Sought: Deletion of site
17784 Miss Roxanne Rebecca Taylor [1560] 1 Object
Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One of the themes of the LDP is to create jobs. The removal of this previously developed land site
from employment uses is illogical and sequentially unsustainable.
The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable and previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing
potential the effect of which would reduce the scale of new and windfall allocation for the town.
There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective
Change Sought: Deletion of site.
530