26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.5.9 Allotments, Policy CFS/10 NEW ALLOTMENTS<br />

Rep No Name<br />

22544<br />

Summary<br />

Mr & Mrs Griffiths [5193]<br />

We would like the following points clarified regarding the allocation <strong>of</strong> allotments at Princes Green, Penrhyn Bay:<br />

There are currently trees on the boundary between our property <strong>and</strong> the Green, we would like to ensure these remain<br />

We will need access to the boundary fence from the Green's side to manage our fences<br />

People Type<br />

1 Comme<br />

Will the boundary fence be increased in height, as our property is set lower than the Green so we would like to avoid people looking down into our property<br />

22437<br />

Will you be able to confirm how close the allotments will be set to our boundary<br />

Countryside Council for Wales (Mr Richard Ninnes) [1948] 1 Support<br />

Summary CCW supports the policy in principle <strong>and</strong> considers it meets ToS C2.<br />

13986 Ms Mary Halliwell [4115] 1 Support<br />

Summary I am writing to protest against the propsoed new housing development on the gounds that:<br />

a) It would be deterimental to the village. It would alter the character <strong>of</strong> the village. There would be a loss <strong>of</strong> amenities <strong>and</strong> an impact on social cohesion. The<br />

value <strong>of</strong> existing properties would go down.<br />

b) It is unnecessary. It has not been demonstrated that there is a need for more houses. There are several brownfield sites which could be used.<br />

More appropriate use could be made <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong> i.e. market garden. I would support the suggested idea <strong>of</strong> allotments.<br />

13541 Cllr Gareth Roberts [3907] 1 Support<br />

Summary Re point 2:<br />

The local authority should be more even more proactive in assessing dem<strong>and</strong> for allotments <strong>and</strong> should investigate further the provision <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> suitable for<br />

allotments in <strong>and</strong> around <strong>Ll<strong>and</strong>udno</strong>.<br />

19471 Mr Crispin Lems Jones [4531] 1 Object<br />

Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele which is identified as an area <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

need within BP25 having the second highest requirement/dem<strong>and</strong> in the County.<br />

Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form <strong>of</strong> allocations to meet existing (<strong>and</strong> potential future) dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

19925 Mr David Bryan Jones [4532] 1 Object<br />

Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele which is identified as an area <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

need within BP25 having the second highest requirement/dem<strong>and</strong> in the County.<br />

Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form <strong>of</strong> allocations to meet existing (<strong>and</strong> potential future) dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

19991 Mrs Elizabeth Gaynor Wade [4533] 1 Object<br />

Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele which is identified as an area <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

need within BP25 having the second highest requirement/dem<strong>and</strong> in the County.<br />

Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form <strong>of</strong> allocations to meet existing (<strong>and</strong> potential future) dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

22532 Abergele Town Council (Mrs M<strong>and</strong>y Evans ) [5181] 1 Object<br />

Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele which is identified as an area <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

need within BP25 having the second highest requirement/dem<strong>and</strong> in the County.<br />

Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form <strong>of</strong> allocations to meet existing (<strong>and</strong> potential future) dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

18325 Mr Allan Frederick Nicholls [1912] 1 Object<br />

Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele which is identified as an area <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

need within BP25 having the second highest requirement/dem<strong>and</strong> in the County.<br />

Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form <strong>of</strong> allocations to meet existing (<strong>and</strong> potential future) dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

18204 Mr Phillip Lally [1762] 1 Object<br />

Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele which is identified as an area <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

need within BP25 having the second highest requirement/dem<strong>and</strong> in the County.<br />

Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form <strong>of</strong> allocations to meet existing (<strong>and</strong> potential future) dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

19150 D C Clarkson [3279] 1 Object<br />

Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele which is identified as an area <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

need within BP25 having the second highest requirement/dem<strong>and</strong> in the County.<br />

Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form <strong>of</strong> allocations to meet existing (<strong>and</strong> potential future) dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

18237 Mr Peter Woodhouse [1809] 1 Object<br />

Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele which is identified as an area <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

need within BP25 having the second highest requirement/dem<strong>and</strong> in the County.<br />

Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form <strong>of</strong> allocations to meet existing (<strong>and</strong> potential future) dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

19139 C Royds [3191] 1 Object<br />

Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele which is identified as an area <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

need within BP25 having the second highest requirement/dem<strong>and</strong> in the County.<br />

Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form <strong>of</strong> allocations to meet existing (<strong>and</strong> potential future) dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

18281 Miss Dawn Alison Poole [1871] 1 Object<br />

Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele which is identified as an area <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

need within BP25 having the second highest requirement/dem<strong>and</strong> in the County.<br />

Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form <strong>of</strong> allocations to meet existing (<strong>and</strong> potential future) dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

19117 J Mitchell [3120] 1 Object<br />

Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele which is identified as an area <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

need within BP25 having the second highest requirement/dem<strong>and</strong> in the County.<br />

Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form <strong>of</strong> allocations to meet existing (<strong>and</strong> potential future) dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

19084 Mr H Tracey [3040] 1 Object<br />

Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele which is identified as an area <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

need within BP25 having the second highest requirement/dem<strong>and</strong> in the County.<br />

Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form <strong>of</strong> allocations to meet existing (<strong>and</strong> potential future) dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

1007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!