26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED<br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

20069 Ms Edwina Rahil [4637] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

21149 E Johnson [4902] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

21125 P Walls [4896] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

19919 Mr David Bryan Jones [4532] 1 Object<br />

Summary We consider the scale <strong>of</strong> growth excessive <strong>and</strong> unjustified to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the Town <strong>and</strong> the LDP lacks a robust <strong>and</strong> credible evidence to support it, fails<br />

to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable <strong>of</strong> delivering the necessary infrastructure <strong>and</strong> house building capacity to support growth (particularly<br />

in combination with the impacts <strong>of</strong> development proposed in Bodelwyddan) <strong>and</strong> would have impact on the culture <strong>of</strong> the Town (including the Welsh language.<br />

Change Sought: Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level <strong>of</strong> growth that supports existing community infrastructure <strong>and</strong> natural population change.<br />

21257 Ms Roxy Roberts [4951] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

21173 Mr Kevin Jones [4908] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

19222 Ms Mary Jamil [4534] 1 Object<br />

Summary We consider the scale <strong>of</strong> growth excessive <strong>and</strong> unjustified to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the Town <strong>and</strong> the LDP lacks a robust <strong>and</strong> credible evidence to support it, fails<br />

to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable <strong>of</strong> delivering the necessary infrastructure <strong>and</strong> house building capacity to support growth (particularly<br />

in combination with the impacts <strong>of</strong> development proposed in Bodelwyddan) <strong>and</strong> would have impact on the culture <strong>of</strong> the Town (including the Welsh language.<br />

Change Sought: Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level <strong>of</strong> growth that supports existing community infrastructure <strong>and</strong> natural population change.<br />

21285 Ms Diane Cattell [4958] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

333

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!