26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Esgyryn, <strong>Ll<strong>and</strong>udno</strong> <strong>Junction</strong><br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

14043 Cllr R Meirion Hughes [4147] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object as follows:<br />

Contrary to PPW 9.2.9. This greenfield site should not be selected when alternative policies could be used at the Former Hotpoint site to achieve the required<br />

jobs growth.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> sustainability, the site is not accessible to key services.<br />

Pressure from WAG to include Esgyryn to reaslise a premium capital receipt.<br />

Significant housing growth already disporportionate for a community <strong>of</strong> this size.<br />

Severe environmental <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape impact concerns.<br />

I support the goal in the LDP <strong>of</strong> reducing out-commuting/out-migration.<br />

Change Sought: Withdrawal <strong>of</strong> site for development in t<strong>and</strong>em with a tightening <strong>of</strong> policy for the former Hotpoint factory to ensure a minimum <strong>of</strong> 300 jobs per hectare. Redraw<br />

settlement boundary to exclude site.<br />

Failing that, identify site only as a contingency for high value prestigious employment, subject to completion <strong>of</strong> a thorough L<strong>and</strong>sacpe Quality Assessment.<br />

14143 Mr C M Worstencr<strong>of</strong>t [4269]<br />

1 Object<br />

Summary I object on the following grounds:<br />

This is an area <strong>of</strong> outst<strong>and</strong>ing beauty <strong>and</strong> habitat for wildlife.<br />

There has already been two large developments built recently.<br />

There is employment l<strong>and</strong> opposite the Welsh Assembly buildings <strong>and</strong> a large industrial estate on the outskirts <strong>of</strong> Mochdre that is largely un-occupied.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

13923 Mr & Mrs B Tranter [4089] 1 Object<br />

Summary We object on the following grounds:<br />

Pendyffryn is heavily congested already with cars parked bumper to bumper.<br />

There are many empty <strong>and</strong> unsold properties up here.<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> green environment.<br />

We all want to protect <strong>and</strong> enjoy the natural beauty.<br />

Extra housing will put a greater strain on road safety.<br />

The gren spaces are rapidly being depleted.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

14424 Mrs F E Hughes [4435] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object as follows:<br />

This is the last bit <strong>of</strong> open countryside that is easy to access from residential areas.<br />

We are going to need this l<strong>and</strong> in the future for producing food so we don't have to import so much from the other side <strong>of</strong> the world.<br />

There is already plenty <strong>of</strong> development.<br />

These houses would not be for local people, local people need jobs.<br />

You should use the old Hotpoint factory for more quality jobs <strong>and</strong> not just car showrooms.<br />

You cannot continue to take more countryside - where will it end?<br />

Change Sought: Delete site<br />

13973 W J Hughes [4110] 1 Object<br />

Summary If we are to loose this beautiful green l<strong>and</strong>, the building <strong>of</strong> industrial units <strong>and</strong> creating a high amount <strong>of</strong> quality jobs for local people should be <strong>of</strong> more benefit<br />

than housing<br />

<strong>Ll<strong>and</strong>udno</strong> <strong>Junction</strong> already has many housing esttes being built on greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Affordable Housing - can young people afford the 20% deposit required - not without quality permanent jobs.<br />

Also, if the site were developed where would the access be. Access from Pendyffryn or Narrow Lane would be impossible without improvements to the<br />

existing highway network - but is there room?<br />

Change Sought: Delete the housing allocation <strong>and</strong> create quality jobs for local people.<br />

14419 Mr & Mrs D T Holl<strong>and</strong> [4434] 1 Object<br />

Summary We object as follows:<br />

There is very little greenfield l<strong>and</strong> left in this area, development would have a huge impact on the environment e.g. loss <strong>of</strong> hedgerows, wildlife <strong>and</strong> flora.<br />

A build up <strong>of</strong> traffic/noise on unsuitable roads i.e. Narrow Lane.<br />

There seems to be enough housing developments at present. More housing doesn't necessarily create jobs.<br />

Why create more industrial units when there are areas that remain empty i.e. The old Hotpoint site.<br />

More brownfield sites should be used for industry <strong>and</strong> greenfield l<strong>and</strong> should be left for the community to enjoy.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

551

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!