26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED<br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

20437 Ms Jan Roberts [651] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

21557 Mr & Mrs Ian & Rosemary Boulton [653] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

18520 Glenys Fall [3583] 1 Object<br />

Summary We consider the scale <strong>of</strong> growth excessive <strong>and</strong> unjustified to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the Town <strong>and</strong> the LDP lacks a robust <strong>and</strong> credible evidence to support it, fails<br />

to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable <strong>of</strong> delivering the necessary infrastructure <strong>and</strong> house building capacity to support growth (particularly<br />

in combination with the impacts <strong>of</strong> development proposed in Bodelwyddan) <strong>and</strong> would have impact on the culture <strong>of</strong> the Town (including the Welsh language).<br />

Change Sought: Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level <strong>of</strong> growth that supports existing community infrastructure <strong>and</strong> natural population change.<br />

17959 G Rothwell [2454] 1 Object<br />

Summary We consider the scale <strong>of</strong> growth excessive <strong>and</strong> unjustified to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the Town <strong>and</strong> the LDP lacks a robust <strong>and</strong> credible evidence to support it, fails<br />

to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable <strong>of</strong> delivering the necessary infrastructure <strong>and</strong> house building capacity to support growth (particularly<br />

in combination with the impacts <strong>of</strong> development proposed in Bodelwyddan) <strong>and</strong> would have impact on the culture <strong>of</strong> the Town (including the Welsh language).<br />

Change Sought: Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level <strong>of</strong> growth that supports existing community infrastructure <strong>and</strong> natural population change.<br />

18399 D Woodhouse [2372] 1 Object<br />

Summary We consider the scale <strong>of</strong> growth excessive <strong>and</strong> unjustified to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the Town <strong>and</strong> the LDP lacks a robust <strong>and</strong> credible evidence to support it, fails<br />

to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable <strong>of</strong> delivering the necessary infrastructure <strong>and</strong> house building capacity to support growth (particularly<br />

in combination with the impacts <strong>of</strong> development proposed in Bodelwyddan) <strong>and</strong> would have impact on the culture <strong>of</strong> the Town (including the Welsh language).<br />

Change Sought: Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level <strong>of</strong> growth that supports existing community infrastructure <strong>and</strong> natural population change.<br />

13539 Mr Goronwy Owen [876] 1 Object<br />

Summary Cynnwys safle 435 Tir ir Dwyrain o Gorwel fel safle ar gyfer tai yn Llanfairfechan. Mae'r safle wedi'w asesu eisoes gan y cyngor ond ni gafodd ei gynnwys ar y<br />

rhestr gan fod pryderon am barcio ar ffyrdd lleol. Mae Asesiad Trafnidiaeth wedi ei gwblhau ar gyfer y safle erbyn hyn ac wedi ei gymeradwyo hyd at 30<br />

annedd yn y man cyntaf gan swyddogion priffyrdd. Mae'r safle ar gael i ddatblygu yn syth gyda mynediad oddiar stad Gorwel.<br />

Change Sought: Cynnwys safle 435 fel safle ar gyfer datblygu tai yn Llanfairfechan.<br />

18388 Kenneth Sudlow [2325] 1 Object<br />

Summary We consider the scale <strong>of</strong> growth excessive <strong>and</strong> unjustified to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the Town <strong>and</strong> the LDP lacks a robust <strong>and</strong> credible evidence to support it, fails<br />

to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable <strong>of</strong> delivering the necessary infrastructure <strong>and</strong> house building capacity to support growth (particularly<br />

in combination with the impacts <strong>of</strong> development proposed in Bodelwyddan) <strong>and</strong> would have impact on the culture <strong>of</strong> the Town (including the Welsh language).<br />

Change Sought: Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level <strong>of</strong> growth that supports existing community infrastructure <strong>and</strong> natural population change.<br />

22339 Welsh Assembly Government (Mr Mark Newey) [2176] 1 Object<br />

Summary In total all types <strong>of</strong> windfall sites are estimated to deliver approximately 30+% <strong>of</strong> the total provision (2334 dwellings). This degree <strong>of</strong> reliance on windfalls,<br />

introduces a considerable degree <strong>of</strong> uncertainty with consequences for clarity <strong>and</strong> ability to deliver infrastructure.<br />

Additionally, the evidence for the continuation <strong>of</strong> the rate at which windfall sites have come forward in the past needs to be robust, clearly justifying why <strong>and</strong><br />

how such a trend will continue over the plan period. If this cannot be evidenced it could result in a serious risk to the delivery <strong>of</strong> the strategy.<br />

Change Sought: Policy DP/2 may need to be strengthened to better guide the release <strong>of</strong> windfall sites in line with the strategy <strong>and</strong> the proposed monitoring at paragraph 5.1.5.<br />

Whilst policy HOU/1 states the level provision <strong>and</strong> contingency housing, the policy would be clearer if it were reworded to make clear that the contingency<br />

omponent is part <strong>of</strong> the overall provision to come forward when required, to ensure delivery <strong>of</strong> the required amount over the plan period.<br />

20685 mrs J Jones [577] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

19267 Mr Eirwen Jones [2716] 1 Object<br />

Summary We consider the scale <strong>of</strong> growth excessive <strong>and</strong> unjustified to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the Town <strong>and</strong> the LDP lacks a robust <strong>and</strong> credible evidence to support it, fails<br />

to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable <strong>of</strong> delivering the necessary infrastructure <strong>and</strong> house building capacity to support growth (particularly<br />

in combination with the impacts <strong>of</strong> development proposed in Bodelwyddan) <strong>and</strong> would have impact on the culture <strong>of</strong> the Town (including the Welsh language.<br />

Change Sought: Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level <strong>of</strong> growth that supports existing community infrastructure <strong>and</strong> natural population change.<br />

19356 Mrs Gwyneth Mary Leech [1361] 1 Object<br />

Summary We consider the scale <strong>of</strong> growth excessive <strong>and</strong> unjustified to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the Town <strong>and</strong> the LDP lacks a robust <strong>and</strong> credible evidence to support it, fails<br />

to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable <strong>of</strong> delivering the necessary infrastructure <strong>and</strong> house building capacity to support growth (particularly<br />

in combination with the impacts <strong>of</strong> development proposed in Bodelwyddan) <strong>and</strong> would have impact on the culture <strong>of</strong> the Town (including the Welsh language.<br />

Change Sought: Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level <strong>of</strong> growth that supports existing community infrastructure <strong>and</strong> natural population change.<br />

374

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!