26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Opposite Bryn Rodyn, Old Colwyn<br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

19174 Mr H G Fetherstonhaugh [4519] 1 Support<br />

Summary We support the allocation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Site</strong> 344, Opposite Bryn Rodyn, Dolwen Road, Old Colwyn as a contingency site, but wish to take this opportunity to detail the<br />

deliverability <strong>of</strong> the site ahead <strong>of</strong> other sites.<br />

With reference to the Key Issues Impacting on the Plan Area site 344 assists in:<br />

Overcoming the high levels <strong>of</strong> constrained l<strong>and</strong> as the site is sustainably located within the settlement <strong>of</strong> Old Colwyn.<br />

Accommodates a sustained housing growth <strong>and</strong> promotes a balanced age structure.<br />

Contributes to the provision <strong>of</strong> affordable housing.<br />

14169 Mr Alan Whitehead [631] 1 Object<br />

Summary This piece <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> has been removed from the plan as buildng l<strong>and</strong> but still remains as a contingency in the event <strong>of</strong> other l<strong>and</strong> being unavailable.<br />

This we strongly disagree with because none <strong>of</strong> the reasons for complaint that were originally made have been changed in anyway.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

14431 Mr Andrew Jones [39] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object as follows:<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> public consultation, documents expensive <strong>and</strong> written in planning terminology, website confusing.<br />

The assessments <strong>of</strong> the sites are untrue, the l<strong>and</strong> is outside the settlement <strong>and</strong> is not semi rural.<br />

The l<strong>and</strong> is designated as 'special l<strong>and</strong>scape value'.<br />

Bus services are inadequate.<br />

<strong>Site</strong>s are in open countryside.<br />

Plot 355 has a high pressure gas main running through it.<br />

The road leading to the sites has severe restrictions.<br />

Access to amenities is very poor.<br />

Have a variety <strong>of</strong> aminal species <strong>and</strong> plant life.<br />

The original size <strong>of</strong> Plot 355 has doubled.<br />

Unacceptable burden on infrastructure.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site<br />

14059 Mr & Mrs John <strong>and</strong> Pat Smailes [2029] 1 Object<br />

Summary We object on the following grounds:<br />

Traffic safety on dolwen Road on the section approaching the 30mph signs.<br />

How can this road possibly sustain an increase in traffic <strong>of</strong> this magnitude in such a dangerous place? We are only 2 cars - you are creating a problem with<br />

potentially 300+ cars.<br />

Further down the road is the entrance for Ysgol Bryn Elian <strong>and</strong> also Ysgol Ty Gwyn Jones, both <strong>of</strong> which already have serious traffic concerns on a daily<br />

basis.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

14393 Mrs Heather Abrahams [2021] 1 Object<br />

Summary The site included in the original LDP did not meet the soundness tests as it is not in a green belt area, there is a main gas pipe running through the field<br />

(confirmed in writing to me by United Utilities who are unaware <strong>of</strong> the inclusion <strong>of</strong> this site in the original LDP/revised LDP) <strong>and</strong> there are serious highway<br />

issues which is the reason the site on the opposite side <strong>of</strong> the road was rejected from the original LDP.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

14061 mr david tomlinson [3905] 1 Object<br />

Summary My main objections are;<br />

These are green field sites. Surely there are brown field sites.<br />

Natural habitats with their own unique flora <strong>and</strong> fauna need to be protected for future generations.<br />

Has an environmental impact study been carried out ?<br />

2 sites have now been identified whereas there was only 1 site in the original.<br />

Building this many homes in a small area would destroy the character.<br />

Traffic on Dolwen rd would massively increase.<br />

Access to the proposed sites is poor.<br />

Local services eg schools , doctors , dentist etc would be put under added strain.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

799

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!