26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Abergele Business Park<br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

17817 Mr Brian Jones [4464] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site.<br />

18922 Mr David Rhys Evans [4414] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

19010 Mr Lewis Jones [4422] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18966 Mrs Jennifer Ann Davies [4418] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18823 Mrs Margaret Kenyon [4405] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18658 Mr John Raymond Stuart Gunning [4343] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

17839 Mrs Pauline M Edwards [4466] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site.<br />

19773 Mrs K Tavernor [4504] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18592 Mrs Jean Tomlinson [4330] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

547

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!