26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Esgyryn, <strong>Ll<strong>and</strong>udno</strong> <strong>Junction</strong><br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

22361 Mostyn Estates Limited (Mr Edward Hiller) [5167] 1 Object<br />

Summary Plan unsound as it will not produce 6800 dwellings due to-<br />

1.Limited number <strong>of</strong> new sites expected to produce <strong>and</strong> sell a high numbers <strong>of</strong> dwellings. Not realistic.<br />

2. Overdependency on windfall sites,<br />

3. Dependency on purchase <strong>of</strong> empty dwellings.<br />

The allocation <strong>of</strong> contingency housing sites at the present time will assist in attaining the housing target.<br />

The contingency housing sites be allocated for housing now to ensure 6800 new dwellings by 2020.<br />

Change Sought: Mostyn Estates Limited propose that the contingency housing sites plus possible other sites be allocated at the present time to ensure the completion <strong>of</strong> 6800<br />

new dwellings by 2022<br />

13484 HE & DP Watson & Mayne [3856] 1 Object<br />

Summary It is with deep concern that I write to strongly object to the proposal <strong>of</strong> the farml<strong>and</strong> known as Esgyryn <strong>Site</strong> to be developed for housing.<br />

This is prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> which is being swallowed up in development.<br />

We already experience a great deal <strong>of</strong> traffic coming down the lane <strong>of</strong>f the roundabout on the A470 - with a further 120 houses it would be extremely<br />

unacceptable.<br />

There are several large areas in <strong>Ll<strong>and</strong>udno</strong> <strong>Junction</strong> which are an eyesore - cannot development be put to better use there rather than using green belt l<strong>and</strong><br />

which everyone enjoys.<br />

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Esgyryn <strong>Site</strong>.<br />

13438 Mr & Mrs Brown [3824] 1 Object<br />

Summary We are concerned about the proposed development <strong>of</strong> Esgyryn <strong>Site</strong> mainly because <strong>of</strong> the possible effect on the wild life.<br />

These are mature oaks <strong>and</strong> hedges supporting a varied population <strong>of</strong> insects <strong>and</strong> birds. Also there are several bats to be seen feeding on insects flying above<br />

the hedges at certain times <strong>of</strong> the year. Winter visitors on the fields are Redwings <strong>and</strong> Fieldfares.<br />

Surely a better use <strong>of</strong> this greenfield l<strong>and</strong> would be for food production?<br />

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Esgyryn, <strong>Ll<strong>and</strong>udno</strong> <strong>Junction</strong>.<br />

13498 Mrs Thelma Hey [3867] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the amount <strong>of</strong> new housing proposed for <strong>Ll<strong>and</strong>udno</strong> <strong>Junction</strong>.<br />

Planning permission has already been granted for 420 houses. Where are these new people going to find jobs?<br />

Esgyryn site is agricultural l<strong>and</strong>, green <strong>and</strong> beautiful.<br />

If you must build at all it should be only to create jobs <strong>and</strong> only if it would lead to at least 2000 well paid jobs.<br />

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Esgyryn, <strong>Ll<strong>and</strong>udno</strong> <strong>Junction</strong>.<br />

13436 Mr & Mrs J R Lee [3823] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the housing allocation at Esgyryn, <strong>Ll<strong>and</strong>udno</strong> <strong>Junction</strong>:<br />

Topography - the l<strong>and</strong> slopes steeply down to our properties so new buildings will overlook quite considerably.<br />

The run-<strong>of</strong>f can be extremely heavy <strong>and</strong> causes the ditch behind our boundary to fill up <strong>and</strong> overflow.<br />

Boundaries - what sort is envisaged, what height <strong>and</strong> who would maintain?<br />

Hedges - at present all maintained - who would do this.<br />

Arable L<strong>and</strong> - fields are used by farmers.<br />

Allotments - have the authories considered this?<br />

Traffic - the cul-de-sac is not a suitable access point.<br />

How are employment numbers calculated?<br />

Change Sought: More information required before the authority can reach satisfactory plans for all concerned.<br />

14004 Mrs M Brown [4122] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the proposed devlopment <strong>of</strong> the Esgyryn site.<br />

I purchased my house for the uninterupted views <strong>of</strong> the countryside knowing that the government has a policy <strong>of</strong> not developing greenfield sites.<br />

I feel that the development will have a very negative effect on the enjoyment I get from my garden <strong>and</strong> will have a significant negative impact on the current<br />

value <strong>of</strong> my home.<br />

The idea <strong>of</strong> bulldozing some <strong>of</strong> our most precious agricultural l<strong>and</strong> to erect a mixed housing, business area <strong>and</strong> eyesore is environmental v<strong>and</strong>alism.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

14002 Mrs R Storey [4121] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the proposed devlopment <strong>of</strong> the Esgyryn site.<br />

I purchased my house for the uninterupted views <strong>of</strong> the countryside knowing that the government has a policy <strong>of</strong> not developing greenfield sites.<br />

I feel that the development will have a very negative effect on the enjoyment I get from my garden <strong>and</strong> will have a significant negative impact on the current<br />

value <strong>of</strong> my home.<br />

The idea <strong>of</strong> bulldozing some <strong>of</strong> our most precious agricultural l<strong>and</strong> to erect a mixed housing, business area <strong>and</strong> eyesore is environmental v<strong>and</strong>alism.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

13999 Mrs L Storey [4120] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the proposed devlopment <strong>of</strong> the Esgyryn site.<br />

I purchased my house for the uninterupted views <strong>of</strong> the countryside knowing that the government has a policy <strong>of</strong> not developing greenfield sites.<br />

I feel that the development will have a very negative effect on the enjoyment I get from my garden <strong>and</strong> will have a significant negative impact on the current<br />

value <strong>of</strong> my home.<br />

The idea <strong>of</strong> bulldozing some <strong>of</strong> our most precious agricultural l<strong>and</strong> to erect a mixed housing, business area <strong>and</strong> eyesore is environmental v<strong>and</strong>alism.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

550

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!