26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED<br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

20113 Mr Arwyn Roberts [4609] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

19527 Mr Adrian Lloyd Jones [4569] 1 Object<br />

Summary The level <strong>of</strong> new build required within the LDP is far more than that which is actually required for the County Borough taking into account past population<br />

changes <strong>and</strong> likely future scenarios.<br />

The levels <strong>of</strong> new build houses proposed for Dwygyfylchi <strong>and</strong> Penmaenmawr are excesive to that which is actually required. Whilst some new houses may<br />

well be needed, the numbers being proposed are too great for such a small village.<br />

Change Sought: Reduce the housing allocation within the LDP.<br />

Reduce the housing allocation for Dwygyfylchi <strong>and</strong> Penmaenmawr.<br />

21593 V E David [4608] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

20233 Mr Ben Liepins [4942] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

20201 M Baldwin [4919] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

20205 S Roberts [4920] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

20109 Ms Pauline Williams [4607] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330, using prime farml<strong>and</strong>/recreational l<strong>and</strong> for c30 houses either as<br />

windfall sites or as rural exception sites.<br />

Raising the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness <strong>of</strong> CC to develop them.<br />

These sites are L<strong>and</strong>scape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP <strong>and</strong> represent development outside the<br />

settlement area. They are prime agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constitute a loss <strong>of</strong> existing greenfield l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> housing need in this settlement.<br />

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 <strong>and</strong> 330.<br />

326

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!