26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Abergele Business Park<br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

13958 Mr Alun Gwyn Jones [1837] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object as follows:<br />

a) Unfair ratio distribution <strong>of</strong> new housing compared to the other regions<br />

b) Refusing to send a representative to a public meeting called by Town Council<br />

c) Not informing householders directly<br />

d) Not consulting with the medical centre, school <strong>and</strong> hospital<br />

e) Effect on the medical services<br />

f) Effect <strong>of</strong> Denbighshire's Plan<br />

g) Effect on schools in the area<br />

h) Effect on traffic management in the area<br />

i) Not including information on the Traffic Management needed<br />

j) Not enough consultation time<br />

k) Choosing Easter weekend as the closing time for objections<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

17696 Mrs Patricia Morris Jones [1849] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site.<br />

17987 Mr D Smith [2498] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18075 Mrs Glenys Kay [1259] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

13998 Mrs Lorna Jones [1836] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object to the large number <strong>of</strong> properties suggested for Abergele.<br />

The scale <strong>of</strong> these proposals will put a strain on local schools, medical facilities <strong>and</strong> environmental services.<br />

In particular, T<strong>and</strong>derwen Farm is adjacent to our property. It is approximately five feet higher than our garden <strong>and</strong> less than five yards from our bungalow.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> bull-dozers etc will surely cause serious instability. We also have excess water draining from the field into our garden <strong>and</strong> fear that pathways <strong>and</strong><br />

roads will increase the amount <strong>of</strong> flooding wihch we experience. There are also several springs <strong>and</strong> a well.<br />

Change Sought: Reduce the housing allocation.<br />

19241 Mr Donald ralph Catherall [1858] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site.<br />

18251 Mr Michael Joseph John's [1812] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

19605 Miss Pat Roberts [1832] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

535

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!