Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES
4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED
Rep No Name People Type
22097 L J Cheetham [4976] 1 Object
Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as
windfall sites or as rural exception sites.
Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.
These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the
settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.
There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.
Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.
22374 Mrs Searl [5170] 1 Object
Summary Whilst section 3.14.5 advises that Llandudno, Llandudno Junction and Conwy are to provide up to 20540 dwellings, the two sites proposed for development
within Llandudno Junction represent just 8% of the provision for the three key towns. This figure is considered to be wholly insufficient to meet the needs of
such a major town and particularly with so much employment land focus.
It would be unsustainable to provide lots of employment land without the associated housing development at Llandudno Junction to support the objectives of
sustainable development. It is considered that additional housing land should be provided within Llandudno Junction.
Change Sought: Additional housing land should be provided within Llandudno Junction. This can be achieved through most effective and efficient use of sites that have
already been allocated for development such as Esgyryn.
21289 Ms Joan Truby [4959] 1 Object
Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as
windfall sites or as rural exception sites.
Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.
These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the
settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.
There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.
Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.
22540 Penmaenmawr Town Council (A M Jones) [5192] 1 Object
Summary The overall figure of 6800 developments within the County is much too high to the current existing developments and is far too ambitious for the county to
absorb without considerations for other factors such as public play areas, employment, schools, doctor, surgeries and dentistry provisions and transportation
issues.
All the developments with Penmaenmawr and Dwygyfylchi appear to be on greenfield sites and no consideration has been given for existing brownfield sites.
Change Sought: The Town Council would welcome a substantial scaling down of the development with a need to actively seek existing brownfield sites for the developments
to continue.
22077 Ms Joan Burton [4960] 1 Object
Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as
windfall sites or as rural exception sites.
Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.
These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the
settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.
There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.
Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.
20241 Ms Jenny Roberts [4961] 1 Object
Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as
windfall sites or as rural exception sites.
Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.
These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the
settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.
There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.
Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.
22539 The Order of the Sisters of St Joseph of the Appartition [5191] 1 Object
Summary The LDP is unsound given that the document has an overreliance on windfall sites and extant permission to meet the housing delivery targets of the district.
Only 37% of the districts housing supply will be provided by allocated site up to 2022. Residential allocations provide the most secure and deliverable sources
of swellings yet the council has chosen to rely on undelivered extant planning permissions and windfall sites. The potential for an undersupply of dwellings to
occur and the lack of flexibility in the LDP to respond to such an occurrence renders the LDP unsound.
Change Sought: Site reference 382, Land adjoining Tyddyn Bach, Penmaenmawr should be allocated for housing.
22535 Penmaenmawr Golf Club (Mr Clive T Brown) [5184] 1 Object
Summary We object to the candidate site reference 329.
The area of land was erroneously the subject of an outline planning application by a previous committee of the club. This committee failed to realise the
impact of building on this land would have on the ability of the club to continue to play golf on the existing adjoining areas.
The committee failed to take account of the affect any injunction to stop playing golf on the grounds of safety would have on the credibility of the golf course.
This will undermine the financial viability of the club for the future.
Change Sought: Do not allocate the candidate site 329 or allow any development on the site.
22523 Abergele Town Council (Mrs Mandy Evans ) [5181] 1 Object
Summary We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails
to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly
in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.
Change Sought: Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.
358