A luta do CEBES - Faculdade de Saúde Ibituruna - FASI

Tuskegee Syphilis Study - Outside the Community, Hasting Center Report, 22(6): 32-35; KING,P.A., 1992. Twenty Years After: The Legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study - The Dangers ofDifference, Hasting Center Report, 22(6): 35-38.14 REICH, W. 1990. “La bioética negli Stati Uniti”. In: VIAFORA, C. (a cura di). Vent’anni di bioetica.Idee, protagonisti, istituzioni. Padova-Roma, Fondazione Lanza-Gregoriana Libreria Editrice,pp. 141-175, p. 146.15. MACKLIN, R., 1987. Mortal Choices. New York, Pantheon, p. 190.16. BEECHER, H.K., 1966. Ethics and Clinical Research, New England Journal of Medicine, 274: 1354-1360; KRUGMAN, S. and GILES, J.P., 1970. Viral Hepatitis: New Light on an Old Disease, Journalof American Medical Association, 212: 1019-29; INGELFINGER, F.J., 1973. Ethics of Experimentson Children, New England Journal of Medicine, 288: 791-92; KRUGMAN, S., 1986. TheWillowbrook Hepatitis Studies Revisited: Ethical Aspects, Review of Infectious Diseases, 8: 157-62.17. FADEN, R. and BEAUCHAMP, T. 1986. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York,Oxford University Press, pp. 153-164.18. BEECHER, H.K., 1966. Ethics and Clinical Research, New England Journal of Medicine, 274: 1354-1360.19. REICH, W.T., 1992. How Bioethics Got Its Name, remarks at the conference “The Birth of Bioethics”,Seattle, WA, September 1992, apud US Congress, Office of Technology assessment, BiomedicalEthics in U.S. Public Policy - Background Paper, OTA-BP-BBS-105, Washington, DC: USGovernment Printing Office, June 1993: p. 5.20. MORI, M., 1990. Bioetica. Nuova scienza o riflessione morale?, Mondoperaio, XI: 120-28, p. 120.21. POTTER, V.R., 1970. ibidem.22. POTTER, V.R., 1971. Bioethics: bridge to the future Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.23. DILTHEY, W. 1883. Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften. Leipzig, Dunker und Humblot Verlag.24. NESPOR, S. 1995. In: BRAIDOTTI, R. et al., ibid., p.9. Ver também MORI, M., 1990, ibid., p. 120.25. LUHMANN, N. 1990. Paradigm lost. Über die ethische Reflexion der Moral. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.26. WALZER, M. 1994. Thick and Thin. Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame, Indiana,University of Notre Dame Press, p. 7.27. GRACIA, D. 1994, op. cit.28. REICH, W.T., 1995. ibidem, p. 20.29. CLOUSER, K.D. & GERT, B. 1990. A Critique of Principilism, J. Med. Phil., 15:219-36, p. 219.30. CLOUSER, K.D. and GERT, B. 1990, ibidem.31. BEAUCHAMP, T.L. and CHILDRESS, J.F., 1994, ibidem, pp. 106-107.32. ibidem, p. 20.33. PELLEGRINO, E. and THOMASMA, D., 1988. For the Patient’s Good: The Restoration ofBeneficence in Health Care. New York, Oxford University Press.34. JONSEN, A.R. and TOULMIN, S., 1988. The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley, University of CaliforniaPress.35. GILLIGAN, C., 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.36. VEATCH, R.M., 1981. A Theory of Medical Ethics. New York, Basic Books.37. apud MORI, M., 1996. A bioética no contexto internacional. Simpósio internacional de Bioética Clínica.Complexo Hospitalar de Heliópolis/Secretaria Estadual de Saúde. São Paulo, 8/03/1996.38. ENGELHARDT, H.T. jr, 1986. The Foundations of Bioethics. New York, Oxford University Press.39 ENGELHARDT, H.T.Jr., 1996. The Foundations of Bioethics. Second Edition. New York, OxfordUniversity Press.40. MALHERBE, J-F., 1990. “Orientamenti e tendenze della Bioetica nell’area linguística francese”. In:VIAFORA, ibidem, pp. 197-235.41. PEGORARO, O., 1995. Ética é justiça. Petrópolis, Ed. Vozes; PESSINI, L., 1995. O desenvolvimentoda bioética na América Latina, Saúde em debate, 47: 57-66.SAÚDE E DEMOCRACIA - A LUTA DO CEBES239