10.12.2012 Views

MANASOTA & PEACE RIVER BBDs Meeting Notebook 10-21-09.docx

MANASOTA & PEACE RIVER BBDs Meeting Notebook 10-21-09.docx

MANASOTA & PEACE RIVER BBDs Meeting Notebook 10-21-09.docx

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary Agenda<br />

Joint <strong>Meeting</strong> and Workshop October <strong>21</strong>, 2009<br />

Manasota and Peace River Basin Boards Page 7 of 29<br />

preservation of this parcel will complement the District’s resource protection efforts<br />

for the Myakka River and the associated Myakka Prairie.<br />

Utilities and/or Improvements – Electric and telephone service are available but not<br />

extended to the property. The FRPP easement does not encumber a five-acre<br />

farmstead which is surrounded by encumbered property. This property is not<br />

improved with any residential structures, equipment or storage sheds. It is fenced<br />

and cross fenced, and has a reasonable system of interior dirt roads suitable for<br />

machinery access and cattle movement between pastures.<br />

Zoning – The property is zoned A – Agriculture and the Future Land Use is AG/R –<br />

Agriculture Rural. Both allow one residence per five acres with the future land use<br />

allowing a potential density of one per five acres. The potential uses are agriculture,<br />

rural residential, farm worker housing, small retail and office, low intensity<br />

recreational, rural recreational, public or semi-public uses, schools, mining, agroindustrial,<br />

commercial uses related to agriculture, and convenience retail.<br />

Summary of Appraisals and Value Comparisons<br />

In accordance with District policy, two appraisals were obtained for the parcel from<br />

Edwin Jones, ARA, with Angus Investments, Inc, and Tod Marr, MAI, with Marr and<br />

Associates Appraisal Company, Inc. The appraisals were reviewed by Andrew Hupp,<br />

MAI, with Hupp Realty Advisors. The appraisal reports were prepared on May 5 and<br />

May 13, 2009. The reports have an effective valuation date of May 1, 2009, and<br />

meet the necessary legal or District requirements and contain the appraisers’ factual<br />

data leading to the value conclusion.<br />

Highest and Best Use – The highest and best use as determined by the appraisers,<br />

based on the physically possible, legally permissible and financially feasible uses for<br />

this property, would be for agriculture.<br />

The appraisers applied the Sales Comparison Approach (Market Approach) to<br />

determine the value of this property. The appraisers relied on recent sales of<br />

comparable property in Manatee, Hardee, Polk, DeSoto, and Volusia counties. The<br />

sales were adjusted for differences that included date of sale, location/access<br />

easement restrictions, and physical characteristics including size and topography.<br />

The following is a comparison of the total proposed purchase price to the appraised<br />

values:<br />

Negotiated<br />

Amount<br />

Appraised Value<br />

Jones<br />

Appraised Value<br />

Marr<br />

Total Cost $487,500 $ 635,200 $685,000<br />

Per Acre Cost $ 2,629 $ 3,425 $ 3,694<br />

The transaction includes the property owner making a 25 percent contribution of the<br />

cost/value for the easement. The negotiated amount, less the owner contribution, is<br />

23.3 percent and 28.8 percent below the Jones and Marr appraisals, respectively.<br />

The allocation of the total transaction is shown as follows:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!