19.11.2014 Views

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART 4<br />

DATA REDUCTION<br />

At the end of the d<strong>at</strong>a collection process all survey responses—and the periodic reports<br />

based on those responses—have now been combined. While responses from each question will<br />

be presented in Part 4, the organiz<strong>at</strong>ion of this part is by question. Part 5 will take a systems<br />

approach to the d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

Question 1: How would you characterize your organiz<strong>at</strong>ion?<br />

A Likert scale was used with the variable defined as: 1 (very low); 2 (low); 3 (medium);<br />

4 (high); and 5 (very high). The 12 items to be scaled are shown in the following table:<br />

Table A.1 below provides the valid number of responses (N), the mean, minimum (Min),<br />

maximum (Max), and standard devi<strong>at</strong>ion (SD) <strong>for</strong> 1 (A) through 1 (L).<br />

12 Items N Mean Min Max SD Median<br />

Q1A Level of trust among employees 207 3.69 1 5 .710 4.00<br />

Q1B Level of employee learning 139 3.60 2 5 .723 4.00<br />

Q1C Level of employee empowerment 207 3.52 1 5 .708 4.00<br />

Q1D Level of management control 206 3.57 1 5 .733 4.00<br />

Q1E Use of teams within the organiz<strong>at</strong>ion 207 3.47 1 5 .851 4.00<br />

Q1F Amount of knowledge sharing among managers 207 3.68 1 5 .904 4.00<br />

Q1G Number of new ideas implemented annually 207 3.22 1 5 .835 3.00<br />

Q1H Level of communic<strong>at</strong>ion between departments 206 3.46 1 5 .812 4.00<br />

Q1I Flexibility of organiz<strong>at</strong>ional policies 206 3.26 1 5 .773 3.00<br />

Q1J Level of process discipline 203 3.24 1 5 .824 3.00<br />

Q1K Quality of in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion contained in IT systems 206 3.35 1 5 .822 3.00<br />

Q1L Level of in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion system integr<strong>at</strong>ion 205 3.08 1 5 .880 3.00<br />

(in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion is consistent and accessible)<br />

Table A.1: Response to Question 1<br />

It is notable th<strong>at</strong> (a), (c), (d), (e), (f), (h), (j), (k), and (l) span the full range of possible<br />

response, from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high).<br />

The distribution of responses is shown below.<br />

Q1-A<br />

Q1-B<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

107<br />

72<br />

22<br />

1 5<br />

very low low medium high very high<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

59<br />

62<br />

14<br />

5<br />

0<br />

very low low medium high very high<br />

A-9<br />

©2011 W<strong>at</strong>er Research Found<strong>at</strong>ion. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!