19.11.2014 Views

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

62 | <strong>Organiz<strong>at</strong>ional</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>at</strong> W<strong>at</strong>er Utilities<br />

plan to stakeholders and the project team, which must be managed, motiv<strong>at</strong>ed, in<strong>for</strong>med, encouraged,<br />

empowered and supported. After start-up, the project moves into an expansion and growth<br />

phase where the processes and approaches needed to sustain the project are established, and implement<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

gets under way.<br />

Leading and Managing<br />

With the emergence of knowledge leadership over the past several decades, new rel<strong>at</strong>ionships<br />

between leaders, followers, and knowledge have also emerged. In the past knowledge was<br />

held tightly <strong>at</strong> the higher levels of an organiz<strong>at</strong>ion and used to maintain control. Today knowledge<br />

th<strong>at</strong> is essential to the success of the utility resides in people <strong>at</strong> all levels. Further, because knowledge<br />

needs shift and change in response to new demands and ideas from the environment, no single<br />

individual or group of individuals can have all the knowledge necessary to run a utility. In this<br />

new world, there is some shift in authority from upper and middle management and leadership to<br />

the work<strong>for</strong>ce, which essentially means th<strong>at</strong> management and leadership give employees more<br />

freedom while still maintaining responsibility—something th<strong>at</strong> is difficult <strong>for</strong> some line managers<br />

and supervisors to do! Yet, <strong>for</strong> leaders and the utility to take advantage of worker’s knowledge and<br />

experience <strong>for</strong> organiz<strong>at</strong>ional improvement, the context, direction and authority to make local<br />

decisions should be <strong>at</strong> the point of action where the best knowledge resides.<br />

Thus the role of leaders is much th<strong>at</strong> of a gardener. Leaders are available <strong>for</strong> advice; <strong>for</strong><br />

integr<strong>at</strong>ing the ef<strong>for</strong>ts of knowledge workers; <strong>for</strong> nurturing an <strong>at</strong>mosphere of trust, collabor<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

confidence and integrity; <strong>for</strong> listening and being a sounding board; and <strong>for</strong> overriding knowledge<br />

workers (only) when they believe th<strong>at</strong> a f<strong>at</strong>al mistake is about to be made. Mistakes will happen.<br />

They are a necessary part of living in a turbulent environment, and having the freedom to make<br />

mistakes is the price <strong>for</strong> cre<strong>at</strong>ivity, agility, learning, and optimum complexity. Wh<strong>at</strong> is critical is<br />

th<strong>at</strong> knowledge workers learn from all mistakes. Leaders recognize th<strong>at</strong> there are some areas and<br />

times, when workers must follow exact procedures and devi<strong>at</strong>ing from the rules cannot be allowed.<br />

A clear example is safety procedures or high risk areas. Thus modern leaders have to work with<br />

their utilities under both conditions, perhaps <strong>at</strong> the same time, encouraging new ideas and explor<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

to improve efficiency or effectiveness in one area of oper<strong>at</strong>ions while ensuring rigid discipline<br />

and training in another.<br />

In addition to providing resources and guidance to their team, a primary job of the project<br />

(team) leader is to monitor and assess project progress. In<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion on progress must be evalu<strong>at</strong>ed,<br />

comprehended and acted upon. Vari<strong>at</strong>ions should be investig<strong>at</strong>ed, and adjustments made when<br />

necessary, while keeping the entire project team in<strong>for</strong>med. While an in-depth tre<strong>at</strong>ment of project<br />

management actions is beyond the scope of this project, included here is a quick synopsis of management<br />

actions during the expansion and growth phase and sustainability phase.<br />

• Check the progress of activities against the plan and make adjustments where necessary,<br />

ensuring th<strong>at</strong> all stakeholders are in<strong>for</strong>med of any changes and, where possible,<br />

included in the decision-making process.<br />

• Review per<strong>for</strong>mance regularly and <strong>at</strong> the pre-planned review points, and confirm the<br />

validity and relevance of the remainder of the plan.<br />

• Adjust the plan if necessary in light of per<strong>for</strong>mance, changing circumstances, and new<br />

in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion, but remaining on track and within the original terms of reference.<br />

• Use transparent, pre-agreed assessment measures when judging per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

©2011 W<strong>at</strong>er Research Found<strong>at</strong>ion. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!