19.11.2014 Views

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

usiness plan and the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy are aligned. It may be beneficial to read the sections on<br />

Developing the Str<strong>at</strong>egy and Writing the Plan in the Planning phase of the toolkit process.<br />

Q36: How well will the oper<strong>at</strong>ional plan support the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy?<br />

Q36-3: Selecting level 3 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the oper<strong>at</strong>ional plan provides some support to the KM<br />

str<strong>at</strong>egy, but not necessarily a large amount. Depending on the anticip<strong>at</strong>ed interaction and<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between the oper<strong>at</strong>ional plan and the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy, this may be acceptable. Where<br />

possible, the two should mutually support each other. It may be beneficial to read the sections<br />

on Developing the Str<strong>at</strong>egy and Writing the Plan in the Planning phase of the toolkit process.<br />

Q36-2: Selecting level 2 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the oper<strong>at</strong>ional plan may provide some support <strong>for</strong> the<br />

KM str<strong>at</strong>egy. If the oper<strong>at</strong>ional plan and KM str<strong>at</strong>egy are independent and do not need<br />

interaction and alignment, then a KM str<strong>at</strong>egy may begin implement<strong>at</strong>ion. However, the plan<br />

and KM str<strong>at</strong>egy may have to be reviewed to bring them into better alignment. It may be<br />

beneficial to read the sections on Developing the Str<strong>at</strong>egy and Writing the Plan in the Planning<br />

phase of the toolkit process.<br />

Q36-1: Selecting level 1 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the oper<strong>at</strong>ional plan will provide little or no support <strong>for</strong><br />

the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy. If this is the case then the plan and the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy need to be reviewed and<br />

brought into closer alignment and mutual support. It may be beneficial to read the sections on<br />

Developing the Str<strong>at</strong>egy and Writing the Plan in the Planning phase of the toolkit process.<br />

Q37: How well will the capital improvement plan support implement<strong>at</strong>ion of a KM<br />

str<strong>at</strong>egy?<br />

Q37-3: Selecting level 3 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the capital improvement plan provides some support <strong>for</strong><br />

the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy. In this case, a KM str<strong>at</strong>egy would have to be reviewed <strong>for</strong> its rel<strong>at</strong>ionship to<br />

the capital improvement plan to ensure the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy supports the long-term goals of the<br />

Utility. If the two are rel<strong>at</strong>ively independent, there should be no issue in commencing the KM<br />

str<strong>at</strong>egy. It may be beneficial to read the sections on Developing the Str<strong>at</strong>egy and Writing the<br />

Plan in the Planning phase of the toolkit process.<br />

Q37-2: Selecting level 2 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the capital improvement plan is rel<strong>at</strong>ively independent of<br />

the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy. This should not be an issue unless the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy directly impacts the capital<br />

improvement plan. In this case, the plan and the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy need to be reviewed carefully and<br />

brought into alignment. It may be beneficial to read the sections on Developing the Str<strong>at</strong>egy<br />

and Writing the Plan in the Planning phase of the toolkit process.<br />

Q37-1: Selecting level 1 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the capital improvement plan will not support the KM<br />

str<strong>at</strong>egy. Assuming the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy needs support from the capital improvement plan, then<br />

these two should be brought into alignment. If there are no neg<strong>at</strong>ive impacts between the two,<br />

the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy could begin implement<strong>at</strong>ion, assuming other aspects of this assessment are<br />

acceptable. It may be beneficial to read the sections on Developing the Str<strong>at</strong>egy and Writing<br />

the Plan in the Planning phase of the toolkit process.<br />

Q38: How well will the Utility’s in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion technology master plan support<br />

implement<strong>at</strong>ion of a KM str<strong>at</strong>egy?<br />

Q38-3: Selecting level 3 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion technology master plan provides some<br />

support <strong>for</strong> the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy. If the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy involves significant technological support, this<br />

D-26<br />

©2011 W<strong>at</strong>er Research Found<strong>at</strong>ion. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!