19.11.2014 Views

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

devi<strong>at</strong>ion and the median falls in the 3.0 range (medium). These indic<strong>at</strong>ors can now be<br />

combined with the responses to question 10: “The following st<strong>at</strong>ements rel<strong>at</strong>e to the in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

systems in your organiz<strong>at</strong>ion” to build a deeper understanding of the perception of the role of<br />

in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion technology (and by extension in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion technology master planning) and the<br />

mission of the Utility. See Table A.6 below.<br />

Table A.6<br />

In<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion systems in drinking w<strong>at</strong>er utilities.<br />

St<strong>at</strong>ement N Yes No N/A<br />

(A) Systems are considered mission critical to the organiz<strong>at</strong>ion 193 171 22 14<br />

(B) The In<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion Technology Department (ITD) is heavily 190* 119 69 17<br />

involved with and understands the business mission<br />

(C) ITD is viewed as a solution provider <strong>for</strong> business problems 189* 102 86 18<br />

(D) ITD is viewed as the technical help desk, and not helpful in 185* 85 100 22<br />

solving business problems<br />

*Two responses <strong>for</strong> B above were “both yes and no”, one response <strong>for</strong> C was “sometimes”, and one response <strong>for</strong> D<br />

was “neither”.<br />

Source: Project 4003 survey process<br />

Note th<strong>at</strong> while the d<strong>at</strong>a presented in Tables A.5 and A.6 is from the same group of Utility<br />

leaders/managers, only 185 responders provided an opinion on the strength of in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

technology master planning and the organiz<strong>at</strong>ion’s mission. In contrast, the st<strong>at</strong>ements labeled<br />

A, B and C in Table A.6 drew a larger number of responses. Here are some key percentages:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

88.6% of 193 responders agree th<strong>at</strong> systems are mission critical to the organiz<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

62.6% of 190 responders agree th<strong>at</strong> ITD is heavily involved with and understands the<br />

business mission.<br />

54% of 189 responders agree th<strong>at</strong> ITD is a solution provider <strong>for</strong> business problems.<br />

45.9% of 185 responders agree th<strong>at</strong> ITD is not helpful in solving business problems.<br />

The last two bullets above represent the same question looked <strong>at</strong> from two different directions.<br />

While there is a larger perception (62.6%) th<strong>at</strong> ITD is involved with and understands the<br />

business mission, there is a lower perception (54%) of its effectiveness in handling business<br />

problems. From this response, it is clear th<strong>at</strong> while the value of in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion technology is<br />

recognized as mission critical (88.6%), there is still some work to do in order <strong>for</strong> in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

technology to strongly support the business mission. When these indic<strong>at</strong>ors are considered with<br />

the p<strong>at</strong>terns cre<strong>at</strong>ed from responses to the d<strong>at</strong>a presented in Table A.6, there are two potential<br />

findings. Either (1) in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion technology—and more specifically, ITD—has not been<br />

sufficiently developed or effectively embedded in support of the business needs of drinking<br />

w<strong>at</strong>er utilities, or (2) leaders and managers who responded to this survey instrument<br />

(representing 207 drinking w<strong>at</strong>er utilities n<strong>at</strong>ion-wide) are not aware of or do not understand the<br />

role th<strong>at</strong> in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion technology is playing in their utilities. In either case, it is clear th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Management</strong> can contribute to helping drinking w<strong>at</strong>er utilities engage the full<br />

Appendix A 39<br />

©2011 W<strong>at</strong>er Research Found<strong>at</strong>ion. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!