19.11.2014 Views

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

toolkit process. You might also wish to review several initi<strong>at</strong>ives in the Tools and Ideas sections<br />

of the toolkit under Resources; specifically, Dialogue, Social Network Analysis, and <strong>Knowledge</strong><br />

Sharing.<br />

Q16-2: Selecting level 2 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> there is below average communic<strong>at</strong>ion among<br />

departments, and specific actions are needed to cre<strong>at</strong>e an environment within which employees<br />

communic<strong>at</strong>e easily and effectively. This lack of communic<strong>at</strong>ion makes it difficult to implement<br />

KM str<strong>at</strong>egies such as building a knowledge centric Utility or nurturing a knowledge sharing<br />

culture. The toolkit is full of resources th<strong>at</strong> support knowledge sharing and communic<strong>at</strong>ion. For<br />

example, see the section on Growing a <strong>Knowledge</strong> Network in the Preparing phase of the<br />

toolkit process. You might also wish to review several initi<strong>at</strong>ives in the Tools and Ideas sections<br />

of the toolkit under Resources; specifically, Dialogue, Social Network Analysis, and <strong>Knowledge</strong><br />

Sharing.<br />

Q16-1: Selecting level 1 indic<strong>at</strong>es very poor or little communic<strong>at</strong>ion among departments of the<br />

Utility. While it may be feasible to successfully implement a knowledge initi<strong>at</strong>ive within a given<br />

department where communic<strong>at</strong>ion is effective, a Utility-wide KM str<strong>at</strong>egy would be very difficult<br />

to implement. The Social Network Analysis tool in the Tools section of the toolkit under<br />

Resources provides a methodology <strong>for</strong> identifying the areas th<strong>at</strong> are holding communic<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

back as well as the integr<strong>at</strong>ive points within an organiz<strong>at</strong>ion. The toolkit is full of resources th<strong>at</strong><br />

support knowledge sharing and communic<strong>at</strong>ion. For example, see the section on Growing a<br />

<strong>Knowledge</strong> Network in the Preparing phase of the toolkit process. You might also wish to<br />

review other initi<strong>at</strong>ives in the Tools and Ideas sections of the toolkit under Resources.<br />

Q17: The level of management’s empowerment of the work<strong>for</strong>ce is ...<br />

Q17-3: Selecting level 3 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the overall empowerment of employees <strong>for</strong> this Utility is<br />

average. The specific level of empowerment should be determined. There is a discussion of<br />

empowerment included in the MQI monogram, A Model <strong>for</strong> Team Learning and Success, which<br />

is loc<strong>at</strong>ed in the Resource Document section of the toolkit under Resources. If it is insufficient<br />

to encourage knowledge cre<strong>at</strong>ion, sharing, and collabor<strong>at</strong>ion among employees steps should be<br />

built into the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy to strengthen this aspect of utility effectiveness. Rel<strong>at</strong>ionship Network<br />

<strong>Management</strong>, an approach to developing self empowerment, is included as a MQI paper in the<br />

Resource Documents section of the toolkit under Resources.<br />

Q17-2: Selecting level 2 indic<strong>at</strong>es a general overall lack of empowerment of employees. To<br />

successfully implement a KM str<strong>at</strong>egy under these conditions would mean building up employee<br />

confidence and practice in taking actions, cre<strong>at</strong>ing and sharing knowledge, and accepting<br />

responsibilities <strong>for</strong> their decisions. This goal could be made part of the overall KM str<strong>at</strong>egy<br />

implement<strong>at</strong>ion. Without employees feeling empowered to cre<strong>at</strong>e and share their knowledge<br />

with others, they are likely to have a difficult time meeting the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy objectives. A<br />

discussion of empowerment is included in the MQI monogram, A Model <strong>for</strong> Team Learning and<br />

Success, which is loc<strong>at</strong>ed in the Resource Document section of the toolkit under Resources.<br />

Rel<strong>at</strong>ionship Network <strong>Management</strong>, an approach to developing self empowerment, is included<br />

as a MQI paper in the Resource Documents section of the toolkit under Resources.<br />

Q17-1: Selecting level 1 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> there is very little, if any, empowerment of employees in<br />

the Utility. Since empowerment is very important to knowledge cre<strong>at</strong>ion and sharing, solutions<br />

to this limit<strong>at</strong>ion should be identified and implemented prior to or during a KM str<strong>at</strong>egy start up.<br />

There is a discussion of empowerment included in the MQI monogram, A Model <strong>for</strong> Team<br />

Learning and Success, which is loc<strong>at</strong>ed in the Resource Document section of the toolkit under<br />

D-14<br />

©2011 W<strong>at</strong>er Research Found<strong>at</strong>ion. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!