19.11.2014 Views

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Q23-2: Selecting level 2 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the Utility’s culture is not com<strong>for</strong>table with change and<br />

may provide resistance to any KM str<strong>at</strong>egy. Utility cultures are often highly resistive to change<br />

unless they have a history of continuous learning and adapting to a changing environment. In<br />

any case, depending on the size of the utility and the specific KM str<strong>at</strong>egy selected, this level<br />

would indic<strong>at</strong>e the need <strong>for</strong> a carefully thought out and significant ef<strong>for</strong>t to ensure th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

culture would accept and adapt to the necessary changes required by the str<strong>at</strong>egy. A<br />

discussion of culture is included in the Connecting the Dots section of the Preparing phase of<br />

the toolkit process and the APQC best practice report on “Cre<strong>at</strong>ing a <strong>Knowledge</strong>-Sharing<br />

Culture” loc<strong>at</strong>ed in the Resource Documents section under Resources.<br />

Q23-1: Selecting level 1 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the history of the Utility is one of stability, and most likely<br />

has a culture which is change resistant. Unless the intended KM str<strong>at</strong>egy requires little or no<br />

change in the current culture, it may be best to address the change requirements be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

initi<strong>at</strong>ing a KM str<strong>at</strong>egy. <strong>Knowledge</strong> management involves the cre<strong>at</strong>ion, sharing and applic<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

of knowledge, all of which encompass learning and change. A discussion of culture is included<br />

in the Connecting the Dots section of the Preparing phase of the toolkit process and the APQC<br />

best practice report on “Cre<strong>at</strong>ing a <strong>Knowledge</strong>-Sharing Culture” loc<strong>at</strong>ed in the Resource<br />

Documents section under Resources.<br />

Q24: The level of trust among Utility employees is ...<br />

Q24-3: Selecting level 3 indic<strong>at</strong>es an average level of trust among Utility employees. While this<br />

may be acceptable to commence a KM str<strong>at</strong>egy implement<strong>at</strong>ion, a high level of trust is desired<br />

<strong>for</strong> maximum knowledge sharing and organiz<strong>at</strong>ional learning. Using teams, team building and<br />

collabor<strong>at</strong>ive groups working closely together to make decisions and take actions on<br />

implementing the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy could improve the overall level of trust in the Utility. Trust in an<br />

underlying theme in the MQI monogram “A Model <strong>for</strong> Team Learning and Success” and the<br />

APQC best practices report on “Cre<strong>at</strong>ing a <strong>Knowledge</strong>-Sharing Culture”.” Both are available in<br />

the Resource Document Section of the toolkit under Resources. You might also want to review<br />

the “Building Trust” and “<strong>Knowledge</strong> Sharing” lists in the Idea section of the toolkit under<br />

Resources.<br />

Q24-2: Selecting level 2 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> there is a below average level of trust among Utility<br />

employees. Under this condition it may be best to consider the importance of trust among<br />

employees as it rel<strong>at</strong>es to a specific KM str<strong>at</strong>egy to be implemented. If trust is significant, the<br />

KM str<strong>at</strong>egy may be delayed until the trust level of the Utility can be increased. A second option<br />

would be to build in a process <strong>for</strong> trust enhancement during the KM str<strong>at</strong>egy implement<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Trust is one of the critical factors <strong>for</strong> any KM str<strong>at</strong>egy and as such, becomes a major challenge<br />

to management and leadership. Trust in an underlying theme in the MQI monogram “A Model<br />

<strong>for</strong> Team Learning and Success” and the APQC best practices report on “Cre<strong>at</strong>ing a<br />

<strong>Knowledge</strong>-Sharing Culture”.” Both are available in the Resource Document Section of the<br />

toolkit under Resources. You might also want to review the “Building Trust” and “<strong>Knowledge</strong><br />

Sharing” lists in the Idea section of the toolkit under Resources.<br />

Q24-1: Selecting level 1 indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> there is essentially little or no trust within the Utility.<br />

Under these conditions it is most likely futile to try to implement a KM str<strong>at</strong>egy be<strong>for</strong>e resolving<br />

the trust issue. Resources focused on trust in the toolkit include:<br />

The MQI monogram “A Model <strong>for</strong> Team Learning and Success” in the Resource<br />

Documents section of the toolkit under Resources.<br />

The APQC best practices report on “Cre<strong>at</strong>ing a <strong>Knowledge</strong>-Sharing Culture” in the<br />

Resource Documents section of the toolkit under Resources.<br />

D-19<br />

©2011 W<strong>at</strong>er Research Found<strong>at</strong>ion. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!