19.11.2014 Views

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction to the Instrument<br />

The Readiness Assessment Instrument<br />

Individual Assessment Interpret<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

For a Utility to be ready to successfully implement a KM str<strong>at</strong>egy it should have certain<br />

characteristics and capabilities. Leadership, management, culture and support staff are all likely<br />

to play a role in the success of a KM str<strong>at</strong>egy. While the assessment instrument is developed to<br />

assist in determining a Utility’s readiness, the final judgment of readiness lies with the Utility’s<br />

leadership. They are the experts who know the intended KM str<strong>at</strong>egy, the stakeholder<br />

environment, and their Utility’s ability to learn and change.<br />

Introduction to the Instrument<br />

This assessment instrument takes 10-15 minutes to fill out, and is designed to help you<br />

answer the question: Is my Utility ready to implement a knowledge management str<strong>at</strong>egy?<br />

A knowledge management (KM) str<strong>at</strong>egy is a program to implement KM throughout the entire<br />

Utility as compared to implementing a KM initi<strong>at</strong>ive in one or more departments or divisions of<br />

the Utility.<br />

There are 40 questions th<strong>at</strong> are divided into five areas, each area pertaining to a specific<br />

aspect of your Utility. EACH QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED. Each st<strong>at</strong>ement or question<br />

asks you to respond on a <strong>for</strong>ced five-point Likert scale in one of the following ways: 1/very low;<br />

2/low; 3/medium; 4/high; and 5/very high. For example, consider the first st<strong>at</strong>ement: A KM<br />

str<strong>at</strong>egy’s contribution to the current per<strong>for</strong>mance of my Utility would be ... If KM is already<br />

understood by leadership and the value of your planned KM str<strong>at</strong>egy recognized as high or very<br />

high, then you would select a 4/high or 5/very high. If the value of KM is understood but the<br />

str<strong>at</strong>egy unclear, or there is perhaps an uncertainty about KM but the planned str<strong>at</strong>egy makes<br />

sense, you might answer 3/medium, indic<strong>at</strong>ing some value but uncertainty regarding how much.<br />

It is assumed th<strong>at</strong> you have a specific KM str<strong>at</strong>egy th<strong>at</strong> you are considering implementing. If<br />

you do not have a KM str<strong>at</strong>egy in mind, then you may wish to read the section on Developing<br />

the Str<strong>at</strong>egy in the Planning phase of the toolkit process. Short descriptions of several KM<br />

str<strong>at</strong>egies are provided <strong>for</strong> your consider<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Because each Utility is unique and possesses a wide variety of characteristics—complete<br />

with its own history—this instrument must be used in concert with in<strong>for</strong>med reflective thought to<br />

determine readiness. Wh<strong>at</strong> this assessment will do is provide key questions and aspects of your<br />

Utility <strong>for</strong> you to think about be<strong>for</strong>e implementing a KM str<strong>at</strong>egy. From your answers to these<br />

questions and your reflection on wh<strong>at</strong> you know about your Utility, you will be able to make an<br />

in<strong>for</strong>med judgment on whether to proceed with implement<strong>at</strong>ion of your KM str<strong>at</strong>egy, or take<br />

some prepar<strong>at</strong>ory steps prior to implement<strong>at</strong>ion of a KM str<strong>at</strong>egy.<br />

The Readiness Assessment Instrument<br />

While a description of the implic<strong>at</strong>ions of item scoring is provided below, it is strongly<br />

recommended th<strong>at</strong> you do not review this m<strong>at</strong>erial until after you have completed the<br />

assessment instrument. Following completion of the instrument, you will be provided with an<br />

Assessment Scoring Sheet which will include a discussion of the implic<strong>at</strong>ions of items scored in<br />

terms of your specific responses.<br />

Complete the Assessment Instrument. A list of the assessment questions is also provided.<br />

©2011 W<strong>at</strong>er Research Found<strong>at</strong>ion. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!