19.11.2014 Views

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PART 5<br />

RESULTS<br />

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE<br />

In the Project 4003 survey participants were asked: How well does your organiz<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

structure support sharing of in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion and knowledge? On a Likert scale from 1 to 5, with 1<br />

representing “very poorly” and 5 representing “very well,” the mean of the 203 responses to this<br />

question was 3.59 and the median was 4. This was among the higher scoring answers to the<br />

questions involving characteristics of the utilities. For example, the amount of knowledge<br />

sharing among managers has a mean of 3.70, the level of trust among employees has a mean of<br />

3.69, and the level of employee learning has a mean of 3.59. All the rest of the questions rel<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

to Utility characteristics are lower than 3.59, some considerably lower. The level of<br />

communic<strong>at</strong>ion between departments has a mean of 3.46.<br />

In contrast, the ability of the human resource department to support learning and<br />

knowledge sharing has a mean of 3.22, well below the mean of the means (the average mean <strong>for</strong><br />

survey response) of 3.44. This shows the perception th<strong>at</strong> the organiz<strong>at</strong>ional structure supports<br />

the sharing of in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion and knowledge better than the human resource department.<br />

KNOWLEDGE SHARING<br />

The good news from the Project 4003 survey response is th<strong>at</strong> the mean <strong>for</strong> the level of<br />

trust among employees on a five-point Likert scale was 3.69 with a median of 4. This is one of<br />

the higher means in the survey. In other words, while there is a disparity in responses ranging<br />

from very poor to very well, the leaders and managers felt more positive about the level of trust<br />

among employees than other areas assessed such as level of process discipline (3.24 mean) and<br />

the level of in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion system integr<strong>at</strong>ion(in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion is consistent and accessible) (3.08 mean).<br />

In the Project 4003 survey response, when asked to assess the flexibility of organiz<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

policies, the mean <strong>for</strong> 206 responses was 3.26. The mean of the means—which provides the<br />

average response <strong>for</strong> this survey—is 3.44. This means th<strong>at</strong> the flexibility of organiz<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

policies is considered lower than average.<br />

On Likert scale from 1 (very poorly) to 5 (very well), 205 responders to the Project 4003<br />

survey valued the level of in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion system integr<strong>at</strong>ion (in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion consistent and accessible)<br />

<strong>at</strong> a mean of 3.08. This represents the lowest mean in the survey, and is considerably below the<br />

mean of the means of 3.44. Further, the mean was 3.35 <strong>for</strong> the quality of in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion contained<br />

in IT systems. See the discussion of the rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion technology,<br />

in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion management and KM <strong>at</strong> the end of Chapter 6.<br />

Although there is room <strong>for</strong> growth, knowledge sharing does occur among drinking w<strong>at</strong>er<br />

Utility managers. Recall th<strong>at</strong> in the Project 4003 survey response, on a Likert scale the mean of<br />

207 responders was 3.68 when asked to assess the amount of knowledge sharing among<br />

managers. However, <strong>for</strong> the level of communic<strong>at</strong>ion between departments the mean was 3.46,<br />

indic<strong>at</strong>ing a wider knowledge sharing gap between departments than between managers, or<br />

between employees.<br />

Appendix A 37<br />

©2011 W<strong>at</strong>er Research Found<strong>at</strong>ion. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!