19.11.2014 Views

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30 | <strong>Organiz<strong>at</strong>ional</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>at</strong> W<strong>at</strong>er Utilities<br />

The third factor is technology. Technology plays a strong role in support of knowledge<br />

sharing by providing in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion resources, network and communic<strong>at</strong>ion technologies; knowledge,<br />

virtual learning, and community collabor<strong>at</strong>ion systems; and team collabor<strong>at</strong>ion artifacts such<br />

as electronic whiteboards, displays, and software packages. Video conferencing and the use of an<br />

Intranet and the Internet gre<strong>at</strong>ly affect how in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion and knowledge are cre<strong>at</strong>ed and shared.<br />

Coupled with good in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion management, technology helps cre<strong>at</strong>e and support the flow of<br />

in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion (and knowledge) across the utility.<br />

On Likert scale from 1 (very poorly) to 5 (very well), 205 responders to the Project 4003<br />

survey valued the level of in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion system integr<strong>at</strong>ion (in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion consistent and accessible)<br />

<strong>at</strong> a mean of 3.08. This represents the lowest mean in the survey, and is considerably below the<br />

mean of the means (the average of the overall survey response) of 3.44. Further, the mean was 3.35<br />

<strong>for</strong> the quality of in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion contained in IT systems. See the discussion of the rel<strong>at</strong>ionship<br />

between in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion technology, in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion management and KM <strong>at</strong> the end of Chapter 6.<br />

As technology changes the way th<strong>at</strong> work gets done, it influences the culture. While ideally<br />

technology in the future would be invisible, currently it is this interrel<strong>at</strong>ionship between workers,<br />

software, and hardware th<strong>at</strong> changes work processes and thereby knowledge worker behavior.<br />

The fourth factor is time and space. Time can be an ally or an enemy, depending on the<br />

utility’s understanding of it and the resources available to respond to emergent opportunities and<br />

thre<strong>at</strong>s. One aspect of time is as a boundary condition <strong>for</strong> focused sharing and interactions. For<br />

example, in Rel<strong>at</strong>ionship Network <strong>Management</strong> employees manage their interactions to sustain<br />

trust and respect in their rel<strong>at</strong>ions, thereby ensuring future access to their network, a necessity <strong>for</strong><br />

quick response. Ideas flow across organiz<strong>at</strong>ions in a nonlinear fashion, and the p<strong>at</strong>h cannot always<br />

be traced by cause-and-effect rel<strong>at</strong>ionships. Space represents part of the context within which<br />

knowledge is shared. For example, sp<strong>at</strong>ial surroundings play a large role in the efficiency and<br />

effectiveness of teams as they meet to cre<strong>at</strong>e ideas or solve problems.<br />

The fifth factor is policies and rules. While some rules may be required, free knowledge<br />

flows and cre<strong>at</strong>ivity respond better to directives in the <strong>for</strong>m of guidance. Some generic ideas th<strong>at</strong><br />

foster the n<strong>at</strong>ure and spirit of knowledge sharing are:<br />

• Everyone has access to anyone in the utility.<br />

• No one can say “no” to a new idea except a senior leader.<br />

• All prioritized e-mails and phone calls are answered within 24 hours.<br />

• If time is short and no one is available, make the decision and explain l<strong>at</strong>er.<br />

• Use a team and personal network <strong>for</strong> all difficult decision.<br />

• Everyone knows the size of their action space (boundaries of their influence); everyone<br />

tries to earn a larger space.<br />

• At staff meetings, leaders take the time to ensure employees understand the line-ofsight<br />

question, the direction and values of the utility. (Line-of-sight refers to the clear<br />

connection between wh<strong>at</strong> an employee does every day and how it contributes to the<br />

mission and purpose of the utility.)<br />

• Context and potential consequences are always addressed be<strong>for</strong>e any significant action<br />

is taken.<br />

• Real-time lessons learned and after action reports are prepared and dissemin<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />

• Employees have assignment and careers, not jobs, and, where possible, are regularly<br />

reassigned. Thus, they work <strong>for</strong> the utility, not a given individual.<br />

• All employees have a responsibility to monitor the external environment <strong>for</strong> thre<strong>at</strong>s<br />

and opportunities and to report them ASAP to the appropri<strong>at</strong>e, accessible person.<br />

©2011 W<strong>at</strong>er Research Found<strong>at</strong>ion. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!