19.11.2014 Views

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

58 | <strong>Organiz<strong>at</strong>ional</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>at</strong> W<strong>at</strong>er Utilities<br />

assess its ability to cre<strong>at</strong>e and share knowledge through connections, and identifies areas to improve<br />

these abilities. For example, the map resulting from social network analysis identifies those who<br />

are central to the knowledge sharing process. Then the following questions are asked: Should this<br />

individual be rewarded <strong>for</strong> the important role they are playing or is this individual hoarding in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

and bottlenecking knowledge sharing and cre<strong>at</strong>ion? Wh<strong>at</strong> happens if this individual leaves?<br />

As an example of the knowledge audit approach through one-on-one interviewing, the<br />

Lehigh County Authority conducted an audit of staff-level managers. The audit allowed them to<br />

determine critical knowledge areas and current knowledge and skill sets, and then identify current<br />

and future gaps. They also identified the consequences of failure, th<strong>at</strong> is, their inability to complete<br />

any of the individual areas of responsibility identified due to lack of knowledge.<br />

Another process of connecting the dots is th<strong>at</strong> of identifying str<strong>at</strong>egies and initi<strong>at</strong>ives<br />

underway or recently completed th<strong>at</strong> are similar to the KM str<strong>at</strong>egies and initi<strong>at</strong>ives proposed.<br />

Because knowledge is <strong>at</strong> the core of wh<strong>at</strong> individuals and utilities do—and because there are many<br />

committed people th<strong>at</strong> are already moving in similar directions (no m<strong>at</strong>ter wh<strong>at</strong> they call it)—the<br />

utility can gain gre<strong>at</strong>er advantage by the linking and melding of similar str<strong>at</strong>egies and initi<strong>at</strong>ives.<br />

Leveraging is a goal of knowledge management. The similarities and differences of these str<strong>at</strong>egies<br />

and initi<strong>at</strong>ives—and how they complement each other—should be identified and broadly<br />

shared to ensure full leveraging of all activities underway.<br />

Building the Found<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

The document repository is the place where much of the in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion available to the utility<br />

decision-makers resides. Because the flow of in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion throughout the utility is the life blood of<br />

the organiz<strong>at</strong>ion, it is critical to ensure an integr<strong>at</strong>ed, connected, well-organized, and easily searchable<br />

in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion system th<strong>at</strong> supports access to in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion when it is needed. The <strong>Knowledge</strong>Base<br />

roadmap provides a framework <strong>for</strong> building the knowledge base in a specific area of knowledge<br />

(<strong>for</strong> a specific community). The knowledge taxonomy, a structured set of names and descriptions<br />

agreed-upon by the utility, is necessary to organize in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion and knowledge in a consistent way.<br />

The knowledge taxonomy is built on the knowledge ontology, a conceptual framework th<strong>at</strong><br />

expresses a classific<strong>at</strong>ion scheme. Together, development of a taxonomy and ontology help ensure<br />

a common language and understanding across the utility while also supporting ease of access to<br />

needed in<strong>for</strong>m<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

As a utility recognizes the value of its knowledge in responding to an uncertain future, the<br />

organiz<strong>at</strong>ion’s culture becomes a core area of focus. Culture—how the work gets done—is the<br />

source of energy, or ap<strong>at</strong>hy, and a major determinant of per<strong>for</strong>mance. Culture is a set of norms in<br />

the workplace th<strong>at</strong> often include unst<strong>at</strong>ed assumptions about people, rel<strong>at</strong>ionships and knowledge.<br />

These assumptions develop over time from internal and external events and all of the interactions<br />

among the work<strong>for</strong>ce.<br />

Because KM is about people, it cannot be done to people, but r<strong>at</strong>her with them and in support<br />

of them as they support the mission of the utility. For example, individuals cannot be ordered<br />

to share knowledge; however, an environment th<strong>at</strong> supports knowledge sharing can be nurtured. A<br />

knowledge sharing culture might emerge from (1) the clear linking between sharing knowledge<br />

and accomplishing the mission of the utility, (2) the expect<strong>at</strong>ion of knowledge sharing, and example<br />

set by senior leadership, (3) the underlying recognition th<strong>at</strong> knowledge sharing is the right<br />

thing to do and will benefit them and their utility, (4) alignment of utility rewards and recognition<br />

programs with knowledge sharing, and (5) an organiz<strong>at</strong>ional structure th<strong>at</strong> facilit<strong>at</strong>es knowledge<br />

©2011 W<strong>at</strong>er Research Found<strong>at</strong>ion. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!