19.11.2014 Views

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

Organizational Development for Knowledge Management at Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Find the First Cut Affinity<br />

Although it is possible <strong>for</strong> one person to complete an affinity diagram, all of the benefits are lost<br />

th<strong>at</strong> come from the melding of perspectives, opinions and insights. The team approach is highly<br />

recommended. Look <strong>for</strong> two cards th<strong>at</strong> seem to be rel<strong>at</strong>ed in some way and group them<br />

together. Look <strong>for</strong> other cards th<strong>at</strong> either are rel<strong>at</strong>ed to each other or to the original two cards<br />

th<strong>at</strong> were set aside. Repe<strong>at</strong> this process until all the cards are placed in 6-10 groupings. Do<br />

not <strong>for</strong>ce-fit single cards into groupings in which they do not belong. These single cards<br />

(―loners‖) may <strong>for</strong>m their own grouping or never find a ―home‖. Encourage team members not to<br />

―contempl<strong>at</strong>e‖ but to ―react‖ to wh<strong>at</strong> they see.<br />

Many managers would like to mentally structure all the cards like an oversized chess game.<br />

The only thing left to do is to move the pieces to their appointed spots. In an Affinity, speed<br />

r<strong>at</strong>her than deliber<strong>at</strong>ion is the order of the day. Doing an Affinity should be a high-energy<br />

process, not a contempl<strong>at</strong>ive exercise. Disagreements over the placement of cards should be<br />

handled simply and undiplom<strong>at</strong>ically: If you don’t like where the card is, move it! Strong<br />

disagreements can be handled through facilit<strong>at</strong>ion and consensus building. (This is where using<br />

yellow ―post-it‖ pads can come in handy).<br />

It is critical th<strong>at</strong> the team allows new groupings to emerge from the chaos of the cards. For<br />

the process to work best, members should avoid sorting cards into ―safe‖ known c<strong>at</strong>egories.<br />

This pigeonholing will <strong>for</strong>ce fit everything into existing logic, preventing breakthrough from<br />

occurring.<br />

4. For each grouping, cre<strong>at</strong>e summary or header cards using consensus.<br />

Look <strong>for</strong> a card in each grouping th<strong>at</strong> captures the central idea th<strong>at</strong> ties all the cards together.<br />

This is referred to as a ―header‖ card. The header card should be typed onto the heading line.<br />

In cases where a central idea does not exist (which happens often), a header must be cre<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />

G<strong>at</strong>her each grouping together with its header <strong>at</strong> the top of the column.<br />

The headers should be, above all, concise. They should say in one to three words the<br />

essence of each grouping. Think of it as an idea still. Ingredients are thrown into the hopper<br />

and distilled until the powerful stuff remains. The headers should there<strong>for</strong>e pack a punch th<strong>at</strong><br />

would be clear to anyone reading it. Imagine th<strong>at</strong> all of the detailed cards under each header<br />

were removed; all th<strong>at</strong> remained were your headers. Would someone who was not a team<br />

member understand the essence and detail of the groups you <strong>for</strong>med?<br />

To be effective, the leader must now help clearly identify the common thread th<strong>at</strong> ties all of<br />

the cards together. This is a central concept, like ―budgeting‖. However, this is not enough. The<br />

leader must also help the team reflect on the color and texture of the common thread identified.<br />

The header can be a breakthrough idea when it reflects the individual content of the cards as<br />

well as the ―spirit‖ of the grouping. Cre<strong>at</strong>ing headers is an opportunity to cre<strong>at</strong>e new twists in<br />

old topics. If the headers sound too familiar, they may deserve another look.<br />

5. Draw a finished affinity diagram.<br />

Draw lines around each grouping, thereby clearly connecting all of the items with the header<br />

card. Rel<strong>at</strong>ed groupings should be placed near each other and connected by lines. Often when<br />

this is done, the user finds th<strong>at</strong> another header card must be cre<strong>at</strong>ed (referred to as a<br />

―superheader‖) th<strong>at</strong> sums up how these two groupings are rel<strong>at</strong>ed to each other. This would be<br />

placed above these two columns and also connected with lines. The final drawing can be done<br />

right on the original sheets or only when the completed diagram has been transferred to another<br />

sheet of paper. It is usually transferred because an Affinity Diagram is often shared with people<br />

outside the team <strong>for</strong> comments and changes. Remember th<strong>at</strong> it is a reiter<strong>at</strong>ive process th<strong>at</strong><br />

should be changed until it reflects the actual situ<strong>at</strong>ion and key factors.<br />

C-7<br />

©2011 W<strong>at</strong>er Research Found<strong>at</strong>ion. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!