interpretatio latina - Notes du mont Royal

1RAGMENTA PINDAKI. IIPOSOJIA. 587
/ / /
_ — \J KJ — O «-» — —_**/_-. \ ^ l / _ W ^ / J
/ / I
. vy _ \J \J — w w/ _ v^ vy _
/ /
— \j w _ v ^ W _ _ _ V ^ V _ W W — _
/ /
_ _ \J w w —
/
V-«
Xaiq', /
/ Stropba. I
V-» W ^ W
w JeoS / ftdva,
U .
XtnaqonXoxdftov
_ W ^ _ W W
naiSeaai
_ _ _ W W
Aatovt
_ W W o - —
Iftiqoiatatov tqvoe,
novtov 4vyaveq, %&ov6e evqilae axtvtjtop tiqae, dvti flqotoi
AdXov xtxXtjoxovoiv, ftdxaqet 8' iv 'OXvftntp vtjXiqpavov
xvaviat x^ovbe dotqov
Antistropha.
r)V ydq vondqoi&e (poqrjvd xvftdviaatv navvoSantov t' dvtfteov
qtnalatv- aXX' d Kotoyevtje onor' wSlveaat Soale
5 dyx^voxote ittif3atvtv, Sii vovi viaoaqee oq&ai
nqtftvwv dneiqovoav xopt]vd, pro quo rectius, quod iam Theod. Cantems V. L. II, 22. assecutut
est, praestat Scholiastes Ilomeri. Inde a versu quarto locum persanavit Forsonus ad
Hecub. 788- Strabo habebat: 'AXXd xal 6 ytrot; sed cod. Mosc. praebet xatvoyevhe;
hinc emendatum Kotoytvtje, ut ap. Apollon. Argon. II, 710. Aytw Kotoyiveta. De-
74- *