19.01.2013 Views

General copyright and disclaimer - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...

General copyright and disclaimer - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...

General copyright and disclaimer - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

departure from Auckl<strong>and</strong> to Corom<strong>and</strong>el Harbour on the Kate on 5 October that same year before<br />

leaving for Engl<strong>and</strong> on the Planter on the 10th. 29 As were the arrangements of release from the<br />

Company, he was obliged to h<strong>and</strong> over all <strong>copyright</strong>s to written material while under their<br />

employ, as well as all reports, manuscripts <strong>and</strong> specimens, in exchange for the total sum of £500.<br />

Upon his return to Engl<strong>and</strong> on 13 January 1842, 30 however, Dieffenbach did manage to turn his<br />

experiences into the two-volume work Travels in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> (1843), 31 a scientific monograph<br />

<strong>and</strong> account based on his early reports <strong>and</strong> narratives <strong>and</strong> published the following year in London<br />

independent of the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Company, despite some of his writings previously finding<br />

themselves in the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Journal, a fortnightly periodical designed to provide information<br />

on current Company activities. 32 Although it is unclear whether Dieffenbach had outright<br />

permission from the Company Directors to publish this work, the former Company employee,<br />

John Wallis Barnicoat, who reportedly witnessed the events, records in his journal that censorship<br />

would have been exercised if unfavourable comments were made toward the Company <strong>and</strong> their<br />

‘image’ of New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. 33 Whether explicit censorship took place or not is unknown, but not<br />

unlikely, as no original manuscript exists, 34 but one thing is certain, not everything written by<br />

faithfully reported; <strong>and</strong> that only those parts which suited the purposes of the Company were published” (17 Feb<br />

1841, cited in: ibid., 81; see 80-83). Other biographers, however, would have us believe Dieffenbach received<br />

numerous offers which he turned his back on in favour of returning home to a country which expelled him: “‘Ich<br />

habe zu große Liebe zum Vaterl<strong>and</strong>e,’ sagte er, ‘als daß ich die mir sich hier bietende Gelegenheit, ein reicher Mann<br />

zu werden, benutzen möchte; auch ist meine Anhänglichkeit an die englische Nation nicht so groß, als daß sie mir für<br />

das Vaterl<strong>and</strong> Ersatz zu bieten vermöchte, und ich verfehle nie, alles, was groß und schön an den Engländern ist,<br />

ihrer Verw<strong>and</strong>tschaft mit der deutschen Nation zuzuschreiben’” (F. Dieffenbach, “Erforscher Neu-Seel<strong>and</strong>s”, 86).<br />

29 New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Herald <strong>and</strong> Auckl<strong>and</strong> Gazette 1:15 9 Oct (1841): 2; The Times (London) 14 Jan (1842): 2. Ensign<br />

Abel Dottin William Best writes on 8 October 1841: “Dieffenbach left on the Kate to go to Engl<strong>and</strong> in the Planter. I<br />

cannot conceive the reasons for this move nor was I aware that he was gone untill [sic] the next day” (A. D. W. Best,<br />

The Journal of Ensign Best, 1837-1843. Edited with an introduction <strong>and</strong> notes by Nancy M. Taylor. Wellington:<br />

Owen (Govt. Printer), 1966, 326).<br />

30 The Times (London) 14 Jan (1842): 2.<br />

31 Ernest Dieffenbach, Travels in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. Facsim. Ed. 2 vols. Christchurch: Capper Press, 1974. (All further<br />

references to this work will be given in parentheses in the text.)<br />

32 In addition to various excerpts from New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> the New Zeal<strong>and</strong>ers (1841), a publication for the<br />

Aborigines’ Protection Society, <strong>and</strong> an account of the Chatham Isl<strong>and</strong>s (1841), a h<strong>and</strong>ful of articles, including two<br />

reports to the Directors <strong>and</strong> one narrative were published in the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Journal in 1840-41.<br />

33 “He was about to publish a book on New Zeal<strong>and</strong> when the Company intimated through their solicitors that<br />

proceedings would be instituted against him if he published anything unfavourable to their interests. After this threat<br />

proposals were made (not exactly from the same quarters) of an arbitration the event of which was that the Dr.<br />

consented to accept £500 <strong>and</strong> give all his manuscripts up together [with] their <strong>copyright</strong> to the New Zeal<strong>and</strong><br />

Company of which of course they may publish as much as suits their own purposes. In this way all truths<br />

unfavourable to the Colony are suppressed <strong>and</strong> the favourable ones are put forward to convey an idea of New<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong>, thus giving rise to those extravagant notions of this country which result in feelings of intensely bitter<br />

disappointment” (9 Feb 1843, cited in: Bell, Ernest Dieffenbach, 86).<br />

34 Andersen, however, notes that there were two original issues of Travels in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> with minor differences<br />

between them, specifically on page 3 of the preface, in which the statement “[m]y researches […] might have been<br />

far more complete, had it been in my power to make an entire survey of New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, but this was denied me […]”<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!