General copyright and disclaimer - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...
General copyright and disclaimer - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...
General copyright and disclaimer - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
departure from Auckl<strong>and</strong> to Corom<strong>and</strong>el Harbour on the Kate on 5 October that same year before<br />
leaving for Engl<strong>and</strong> on the Planter on the 10th. 29 As were the arrangements of release from the<br />
Company, he was obliged to h<strong>and</strong> over all <strong>copyright</strong>s to written material while under their<br />
employ, as well as all reports, manuscripts <strong>and</strong> specimens, in exchange for the total sum of £500.<br />
Upon his return to Engl<strong>and</strong> on 13 January 1842, 30 however, Dieffenbach did manage to turn his<br />
experiences into the two-volume work Travels in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> (1843), 31 a scientific monograph<br />
<strong>and</strong> account based on his early reports <strong>and</strong> narratives <strong>and</strong> published the following year in London<br />
independent of the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Company, despite some of his writings previously finding<br />
themselves in the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Journal, a fortnightly periodical designed to provide information<br />
on current Company activities. 32 Although it is unclear whether Dieffenbach had outright<br />
permission from the Company Directors to publish this work, the former Company employee,<br />
John Wallis Barnicoat, who reportedly witnessed the events, records in his journal that censorship<br />
would have been exercised if unfavourable comments were made toward the Company <strong>and</strong> their<br />
‘image’ of New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. 33 Whether explicit censorship took place or not is unknown, but not<br />
unlikely, as no original manuscript exists, 34 but one thing is certain, not everything written by<br />
faithfully reported; <strong>and</strong> that only those parts which suited the purposes of the Company were published” (17 Feb<br />
1841, cited in: ibid., 81; see 80-83). Other biographers, however, would have us believe Dieffenbach received<br />
numerous offers which he turned his back on in favour of returning home to a country which expelled him: “‘Ich<br />
habe zu große Liebe zum Vaterl<strong>and</strong>e,’ sagte er, ‘als daß ich die mir sich hier bietende Gelegenheit, ein reicher Mann<br />
zu werden, benutzen möchte; auch ist meine Anhänglichkeit an die englische Nation nicht so groß, als daß sie mir für<br />
das Vaterl<strong>and</strong> Ersatz zu bieten vermöchte, und ich verfehle nie, alles, was groß und schön an den Engländern ist,<br />
ihrer Verw<strong>and</strong>tschaft mit der deutschen Nation zuzuschreiben’” (F. Dieffenbach, “Erforscher Neu-Seel<strong>and</strong>s”, 86).<br />
29 New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Herald <strong>and</strong> Auckl<strong>and</strong> Gazette 1:15 9 Oct (1841): 2; The Times (London) 14 Jan (1842): 2. Ensign<br />
Abel Dottin William Best writes on 8 October 1841: “Dieffenbach left on the Kate to go to Engl<strong>and</strong> in the Planter. I<br />
cannot conceive the reasons for this move nor was I aware that he was gone untill [sic] the next day” (A. D. W. Best,<br />
The Journal of Ensign Best, 1837-1843. Edited with an introduction <strong>and</strong> notes by Nancy M. Taylor. Wellington:<br />
Owen (Govt. Printer), 1966, 326).<br />
30 The Times (London) 14 Jan (1842): 2.<br />
31 Ernest Dieffenbach, Travels in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. Facsim. Ed. 2 vols. Christchurch: Capper Press, 1974. (All further<br />
references to this work will be given in parentheses in the text.)<br />
32 In addition to various excerpts from New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> the New Zeal<strong>and</strong>ers (1841), a publication for the<br />
Aborigines’ Protection Society, <strong>and</strong> an account of the Chatham Isl<strong>and</strong>s (1841), a h<strong>and</strong>ful of articles, including two<br />
reports to the Directors <strong>and</strong> one narrative were published in the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Journal in 1840-41.<br />
33 “He was about to publish a book on New Zeal<strong>and</strong> when the Company intimated through their solicitors that<br />
proceedings would be instituted against him if he published anything unfavourable to their interests. After this threat<br />
proposals were made (not exactly from the same quarters) of an arbitration the event of which was that the Dr.<br />
consented to accept £500 <strong>and</strong> give all his manuscripts up together [with] their <strong>copyright</strong> to the New Zeal<strong>and</strong><br />
Company of which of course they may publish as much as suits their own purposes. In this way all truths<br />
unfavourable to the Colony are suppressed <strong>and</strong> the favourable ones are put forward to convey an idea of New<br />
Zeal<strong>and</strong>, thus giving rise to those extravagant notions of this country which result in feelings of intensely bitter<br />
disappointment” (9 Feb 1843, cited in: Bell, Ernest Dieffenbach, 86).<br />
34 Andersen, however, notes that there were two original issues of Travels in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> with minor differences<br />
between them, specifically on page 3 of the preface, in which the statement “[m]y researches […] might have been<br />
far more complete, had it been in my power to make an entire survey of New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, but this was denied me […]”<br />
63