Leibniz, Akademie-Ausgabe, Bd. I, 20 - Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz ...

N. 437 ii. allgemeiner und gelehrter briefwechsel 1701–1702 749
Saltzburg. 29. Jan. 1702.
I am got thus far on my way for Venice, and this being the first Town that I made any
stop at, I take this oppertunity to thank you once more for your Obligeing letters, and
to beg of you, if you think it convenient, to obtain the Electrices letter to the Dutchesse
of Modena; to w[hi]ch place I design to goe after having visited the Imperiall Army in 5
their winter quarters. If the Electrice does not usually write to the Dutchesse, t’will
be improper to ask that favour of Her Highnesse; but you are a better Judge of that
than I am. Whilest I was at Vienna I had the Honour of conversing frequently with
Prince Christian, who is a very sober Studious prince, and seems to me to be one of
the valuablest men of quality in the Imperiall court, and the very reverse of his Brother 10
Prince Maximilian.
I hope you received my last from Vienna, because in it I sent you the methods of our
Insurance offices; but not knowing whether you were at Berlin or Hannover, I directed it
to M r Plantamour.
I must desire you to send the Enclosed speedily forward for England; and to give my 15
humblest duty to al the faire Ladys of both courts, but in perticular to Mad le Pelnitz. I
am 〈...〉
Direct to me Chez Monsieur Broughton Consul de sa Majesté Brittannique à Venise.
437. JOHANN FABRICIUS AN LEIBNIZ
Helmstedt, 30. Januar 1702. [434. 443.] 20
Überlieferung: K Abfertigung: LBr. 251 Bl. 131. 4 o . 2 S. Links oben auf Bl. 131 r o Vermerk
von Leibniz’ Hand: ” resp.‘‘.
De felici et glorioso cum Regina reditu gratulor Exc. Tuae. Nec est, quod solicitus
sis de excutiendis literis, num mihi debeatur responsum; nullum enim ex debito
(nisi gratiam velis debitum appellare) mihi est reddendum. Niemeieri causa a Cellen- 25
sibus ad Senatum acad. paucis abhinc diebus rescriptum fuit, causam denegatae hac-
Zu N. 437: K antwortet auf N. 434 und hatte einen nicht identifizierten Fabriciusbrief als Beischluss.
Leibniz’ Antwort (vgl. die Überlieferung) wurde nicht gefunden.
29. 11. 2006