Vad hände sen? - Göteborgs universitet

vad hände sen?Herbert W (1980) Blind Reviewing Hotly debated, Taking hold. Humanitets JournalsHumanitets Report 2Husu L (2001) Sexism, Support and Survival in Academia: Academic Women and HiddenDiscrimination in Finland (Diss) Dep. of Social Psychology, University of HelsinkiJordansson B (1999) Jämställdhetspolitiskens villkor. Politiska intentioners möten med denakademiska världen: exemplet ”Thamprofessurerna”. 1/1999 Nationella sekretariatet förGenusforskningKyvik (1991) Productivity in Academia: Scientific Publishing at Norwegian Universities.Rådet for Samfundsvetenskaplig Forskning NAFV UniversitetsforlagetLatour B &Woolgar S (1979) Laboratory Life: The construction of scientific facts.Princeton University pressLong (1993) Women in Science part 2. The impact Enigma- why women biochemistspapers are more cited than Men’s. Current contents ISIMackinnon, A (1997) Love and freedom: Professional women and the reshaping of personallife. Cambridge University PressMählck P (2003) Mapping Gender in Academic workplaces: Ways of reproducing genderinequality within the discourse of equality (Diss) Umeå University, Dep of SociologyNo 33Sonnert och Holton (1995) Gender differences in scientific careers. New Jersey RutgersUniversity Press.Søndergaard DM (2001) Consensual and disensual university cultures: Gender powerand academia. Nordic journal of women studies No 3 Vol 9Thomas K (1990) Gender and Subject in Higher Education. Milton Keynes. Society forResearch into higher education & Open University PressTraweek S (1988) Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The world of High Energy Physicists.Cambridge. Harvard University Press.Törnqvist M (1998) Politik Kön och Konstruktioner – en feministisk analys av förslaget ochdebatten om positiv särbehandling inom akademin, C-uppsats, Sociologiska institutionenUppsala UniversitetVold A och Wennerås C (1997) ”Nepotism and Sexism in Per-review”. Nature 387Offentliga tryck:Prop: 1994/95:164SOU 2004:27:9220