16.12.2015 Views

Guía de Práctica Clínica sobre Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico

VTH4I

VTH4I

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

555 Neumann I, Fuhrmann H, Fang I-F, Jaeger A, Bayer P, Kovarik J. Association between<br />

mycophenolic acid 12-h trough levels and clinical endpoints in patients with autoimmune<br />

disease on mycophenolate mofetil. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 3514–3520.<br />

556 Liu L, Jiang Y, Wang L, Yao L, Li Z. Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil<br />

versus Cyclophosphami<strong>de</strong> for Induction Therapy of <strong>Lupus</strong> Nephritis. Drugs 2012; 72:<br />

1521–1533.<br />

557 Lertdumrongluk P, Somparn P, Kittanamongkolchai W, Traitanon O, Vadcharavivad S,<br />

Avihingsanon Y. Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in severe lupus nephritis. Kidney<br />

Int 2010; 78: 389–395.<br />

558 Grootscholten C, Ligtenberg G, Hagen EC, van <strong>de</strong>n Wall Bake a WL, <strong>de</strong> Glas-Vos JW,<br />

Bijl M et al. Azathioprine/methylprednisolone versus cyclophosphami<strong>de</strong> in proliferative<br />

lupus nephritis. A randomized controlled trial. Kidney Int 2006; 70: 732–742.<br />

559 Wang S, Li X, Qu L, Wang R, Chen Y, Li Q et al. Tacrolimus versus cyclophosphami<strong>de</strong> as<br />

treatment for diffuse proliferative or membranous lupus nephritis: a non-randomized<br />

prospective cohort study. <strong>Lupus</strong> 2012; 21: 1025–1035.<br />

560 Yang M, Li M, He W, Wang B, Gu Y. Calcineurin inhibitors may be a reasonable<br />

alternative to cyclophosphami<strong>de</strong> in the induction treatment of active lupus nephritis: A<br />

systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 2014; 7: 1663–1670.<br />

561 Moroni G, Gallelli B, Sinico RA, Romano G, Sinigaglia L, Messa P. Rituximab versus oral<br />

cyclophosphami<strong>de</strong> for treatment of relapses of proliferative lupus nephritis: a clinical<br />

observational study. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71: 1751–2.<br />

562 Moroni G, Raffiotta F, Trezzi B, Giglio E, Mezzina N, Del Papa N et al. Rituximab vs<br />

mycophenolate and vs cyclophosphami<strong>de</strong> pulses for induction therapy of active lupus<br />

nephritis: a clinical observational study. Rheumatology 2014; 54.<br />

doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ket462.<br />

563 Ramos-Casals M, Soto MJ, Cuadrado MJ, Khamashta M a. Rituximab in systemic lupus<br />

erythematosus: A systematic review of off-label use in 188 cases. <strong>Lupus</strong> 2009; 18: 767–776.<br />

564 Condon MB, Ashby D, Pepper RJ, Cook HT, Levy JB, Griffith M et al. Prospective<br />

observational single-centre cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness of treating lupus<br />

nephritis with rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil but no oral steroids. Ann Rheum Dis<br />

2013; 72: 1280–1286.<br />

565 Mohan S, Radhakrishnan J. Geographical variation in the response of lupus nephritis to<br />

mycophenolate mofetil induction therapy. Clin Nephrol 2011; 75: 233–241.<br />

566 Wilson ECF, Jayne DRW, Dellow E, Fordham RJ. The cost-effectiveness of<br />

mycophenolate mofetil as firstline therapy in active lupus nephritis. Rheumatology<br />

(Oxford) 2007; 46: 1096–1101.<br />

567 Kellum J a, Lameire N. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a<br />

KDIGO summary (Part 1). Crit Care 2013; 17: 204.<br />

GUÍA DE PRÁCTICA CLÍNICA SOBRE LUPUS ERITEMATOSO SISTÉMICO 477

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!