27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120 Chapter 5<br />

Time 1 Time 2<br />

Assignment Pretest<br />

Intervention Posttest<br />

Group 1 R O X O<br />

1 2<br />

Group 2 R O O<br />

Figure 5.1a. The classic design: Two-group pretest-posttest.<br />

3<br />

4<br />

and posttest scores for the first group might have occurred anyway, even if the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention hadn’t taken place.<br />

Patricia Chapman (Chapman et al. 1997) wanted to educate young female<br />

athletes about sports nutrition. She and her colleagues worked with an eightteam<br />

girl’s high school softball league <strong>in</strong> California. There were n<strong>in</strong>e 14–18<br />

years olds on each team, and Chapman et al. assigned each of the 72 players<br />

randomly to one of two groups. In the treatment group, the girls got two, 45-<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ute lectures a week for 6 weeks about dehydration, weight loss, vitam<strong>in</strong><br />

and m<strong>in</strong>eral supplements, energy sources, and so on. The control group got no<br />

<strong>in</strong>struction.<br />

Before the program started, Chapman et al. asked each participant to complete<br />

the Nutrition Knowledge and Attitude Questionnaire (Werblow et al.<br />

1978) and to list the foods they’d eaten <strong>in</strong> the previous 24 hours. The nutrition<br />

knowledge-attitude test and the 24-hour dietary recall test were the pretests<br />

<strong>in</strong> this experiment. Six weeks later, when the program was over, Chapman et<br />

al. gave the participants the same two tests. These were the posttests. By compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the data from the pretests and the posttests, Chapman et al. hoped to<br />

test whether the nutrition education program had made a difference.<br />

The education <strong>in</strong>tervention did make a difference—<strong>in</strong> knowledge, but not<br />

<strong>in</strong> reported behavior. Both groups scored about the same <strong>in</strong> the pretest on<br />

knowledge and attitudes about nutrition, but the girls who went through the<br />

lecture series scored about 18 po<strong>in</strong>ts more (out of 200 possible po<strong>in</strong>ts) <strong>in</strong> the<br />

posttest than did those <strong>in</strong> the control group.<br />

However, the program had no effect on what the girls reported eat<strong>in</strong>g. After<br />

6 weeks of lectures, the girls <strong>in</strong> the treatment group reported consum<strong>in</strong>g 1,892<br />

calories <strong>in</strong> the previous 24 hours, while the girls <strong>in</strong> the control group reported<br />

1,793 calories. A statistical dead heat. This is not nearly enough for young<br />

female athletes, and the results confirmed for Chapman what other studies had<br />

already shown—that for many adolescent females, the attraction of competitive<br />

sports is the possibility of los<strong>in</strong>g weight.<br />

This classic experimental design is used widely to evaluate educational pro-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!