27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

328 Chapter 12<br />

The 5-po<strong>in</strong>t scale might become 3 po<strong>in</strong>ts or 7 po<strong>in</strong>ts, and the agree-disagree<br />

scale may become approve-disapprove, favor-oppose, or excellent-bad, but the<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is the same. These are all Likert-type scales.<br />

I say ‘‘Likert-type scales’’ rather than just ‘‘Likert scales’’ because Likert<br />

did more than just <strong>in</strong>troduce a format. He was <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

states of people (attitudes, emotions, orientations) and he realized that most<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal states are multidimensional. You hear a lot of talk these days about<br />

conservatives and liberals, but the concept of political orientation is very complex.<br />

A person who is liberal on matters of domestic policy—favor<strong>in</strong>g government-supported<br />

health care, for example—may be conservative on matters of<br />

foreign political policy—aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> any foreign military actions.<br />

Someone who is liberal on matters of foreign economic policy—favor<strong>in</strong>g economic<br />

aid for all democracies that ask for it—may be conservative on matters<br />

of personal behavior—aga<strong>in</strong>st same-sex marriage, for example.<br />

The liberal-conservative dimension on matters of personal behavior is also<br />

complicated. There’s no way to assign people to a category of this variable by<br />

ask<strong>in</strong>g one question. People can have live-and-let-live attitudes about sexual<br />

preference and extramarital sex and be aga<strong>in</strong>st a woman’s right to an abortion<br />

on demand.<br />

Of course, there are packag<strong>in</strong>g effects. People who are conservative on one<br />

dimension of political orientation are likely to be conservative on other dimensions,<br />

and people who are liberal on one k<strong>in</strong>d of personal behavior are likely<br />

to be liberal on others. Still, no s<strong>in</strong>gle question lets you scale people <strong>in</strong> general<br />

on a variable as complex as ‘‘attitude toward personal behavior,’’ let alone<br />

‘‘political orientation.’’ That’s why we need composite scales.<br />

Steps <strong>in</strong> Build<strong>in</strong>g a Likert Scale<br />

Likert’s method was to take a long list of possible scal<strong>in</strong>g items for a concept<br />

and f<strong>in</strong>d the subsets that measured the various dimensions. If the concept<br />

were unidimensional, then one subset would do. If it were multidimensional,<br />

then several subsets would be needed. Here are the steps <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g and test<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a Likert scale.<br />

1. Identify and label the variable you want to measure. This is generally done by<br />

<strong>in</strong>duction—that is, from your own experience (Spector 1992:13). After you work<br />

<strong>in</strong> some area of research for a while, you’ll develop some ideas about the variables<br />

you want to measure. The people you talk to <strong>in</strong> focus groups, for example,<br />

may impress you with the idea that ‘‘people are afraid of crime around here,’’<br />

and you decide to scale people on the variable ‘‘fear of crime.’’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!