27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Subject Index 787<br />

simple scales, 318–19, 320<br />

‘‘S<strong>in</strong>ce the Eruption of Mt. St. Helens’’<br />

(Loftus and Marburger), 249<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>dicator scales, 318–19, 320<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle-l<strong>in</strong>k cluster<strong>in</strong>g, 690–91, 692<br />

Six Culture Study, 422–23<br />

skepticism, 4<br />

skewed distribution, 172, 172, 575<br />

Sk<strong>in</strong>ner, B. F., 82<br />

small-world experiment, 136–37<br />

snowball sampl<strong>in</strong>g, 187, 192, 193. See<br />

sampl<strong>in</strong>g, cha<strong>in</strong> referral<br />

social activism, positivism and, 18<br />

social contact theory, 64<br />

social contract, 11–12<br />

social desirability effect, 250<br />

social facts problem, 89–90<br />

social <strong>in</strong>dicators, 569<br />

Social Physics (Quételet), 18<br />

social research: cause and effect, 28,<br />

60–66; as a craft, 1–2; measurement,<br />

28, 35–37, 45–49; qualitative vs. quantitative,<br />

24–25; 451–52; reliability, 28,<br />

54; sameness with<strong>in</strong> social sciences,<br />

2–3. See also research designs; theory;<br />

validity; variables<br />

social sciences: development of, 10–12;<br />

success and failures of, 15–18<br />

Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI),<br />

98, 99<br />

Society for Applied <strong>Anthropology</strong>, 75<br />

sociobiological paradigm, 79<br />

socioeconomic status (SES), 37, 319<br />

Sociological Abstracts, 103–4<br />

sociology, nam<strong>in</strong>g controversy, 14<br />

Solomon four-group design, 121, 121–22<br />

Spearman, Charles E., 676<br />

Spearman’s r, 621–22<br />

specialized <strong>in</strong>formants, 196, 200–202,<br />

206–7<br />

Spence, Janet, 44<br />

Spier, Leslie, 343<br />

split-half reliability test, 333<br />

spot sampl<strong>in</strong>g, 413, 425. See also time<br />

allocation studies<br />

spuriousness, 61, 62–63<br />

Stal<strong>in</strong>, Josef, 6<br />

Standard Cross-Cultural Sample of 186<br />

societies (Murdock and White), 516<br />

standard deviation, 170, 581–83<br />

standard error (SE), 170, 587<br />

standard error of the mean (SEM), 587<br />

standardized coefficients, 666<br />

standardized values, 671<br />

standard scores, 171, 590–91<br />

static group comparison, 126–28<br />

statistical power, 642–44<br />

statistical significance, 585–86, 595, 642<br />

statistical significance test<strong>in</strong>g, 595; chisquare,<br />

592; F-ratio 601; gamma,<br />

618–19; Pearson’s r, 630–32; t-test,<br />

two sample, 597–98; validity of,<br />

640–44<br />

stem-and-leaf plots, 573–74, 574<br />

stepwise multiple regression, 667<br />

stimulus group, 110, 111<br />

strategic methods, 3, 343–44<br />

stratified random sampl<strong>in</strong>g, 153–56<br />

Street Corner Society (Whyte), 197<br />

street-<strong>in</strong>tercept survey, 161, 257<br />

str<strong>in</strong>g variables, 555<br />

structure, 87<br />

structured <strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g, 212, 251–317.<br />

See also cultural doma<strong>in</strong> analysis;<br />

<strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g; questionnaires<br />

The Subjection of Women (Mill), 18<br />

subjectivity, 22<br />

sucker bias, 361<br />

sufficient condition, 548<br />

Summer Institute of L<strong>in</strong>guistics (SIL),<br />

396<br />

sum of the squares, 598, 599–600<br />

superstructure, 87<br />

Supreme Court, U.S., 147, 438<br />

survey research. See questionnaires<br />

SYMLOG (Bales and Cohen), 420<br />

symmetric, 685<br />

synoptic problem, 474<br />

syntax, 480

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!