27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bivariate Analysis: Test<strong>in</strong>g Relations 615<br />

where a, b, c, and d are the actual contents of the four cells <strong>in</strong> the 2 2 table<br />

(see figure 20.2 above) and n is the total number of cases. An exclamation<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t signifies the factorial of a number, or the product of a sequence of numbers.<br />

So, 4! is four-factorial, or 4 3 2 1 24. Calculators can’t<br />

handle the factorials of large numbers, but you can do the needed calculations<br />

on a spreadsheet when you have the relatively small numbers <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> a<br />

Fisher’s exact test.<br />

The exact probability of observ<strong>in</strong>g the particular distribution of cases <strong>in</strong><br />

table 20.9 is:<br />

p (362,880)(720)(40,320)(5,040)<br />

(1,307,674,368,000)(5,040)(2)(1)(120) 0.033566434<br />

For a one-tailed test of the null hypothesis, we need to add this probability to<br />

the probability of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g any other distributions that are more extreme than<br />

the one <strong>in</strong> the actual data. There is one configuration of these data that is more<br />

extreme: a 8, b 0, c 1, and d 6 (where a, b, c, and d are the cells<br />

<strong>in</strong> figure 20.2). The exact probability of that distribution is 0.001398601. For<br />

a one-tailed test, we add these probabilities:<br />

0.033566434 0.001398601 0.034965<br />

A two-tailed test is simply twice this probability, or 0.06993. There is a<br />

strong h<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> these data that men who are above median height have more<br />

girlfriends than are men who are below median height <strong>in</strong> this tribe. But the<br />

case is tentative and awaits further tests on larger samples.<br />

Gamma: The All-Purpose PRE Measure of<br />

Association for Ord<strong>in</strong>al Variables<br />

Once you understand the PRE pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, a lot of th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> statistics fall <strong>in</strong>to<br />

place. Kempton et al. (1995) surveyed <strong>in</strong>tentionally selected samples of people<br />

<strong>in</strong> the United States whom they thought would show pro- and anti-environmentalist<br />

attitudes. (Members of the Sierra Club, for example, are people<br />

you’d anticipate would be pro-environmental activism, while loggers are people<br />

you’d th<strong>in</strong>k would be aga<strong>in</strong>st that k<strong>in</strong>d of activity.) Here are two questions<br />

from Kempton et al.’s study:<br />

You shouldn’t force people to change their lifestyle for the sake of the environment.<br />

1. Disagree 2. Neutral 3. Agree

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!