27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Structured Interview<strong>in</strong>g II: Cultural Doma<strong>in</strong> Analysis 315<br />

nahakaa' h<strong>in</strong>aanii<br />

land dwellers<br />

naaghaii<br />

walkers<br />

naat'a'ii<br />

fowl<br />

naa'na'ii<br />

crawlers<br />

ch'osh<br />

<strong>in</strong>sects<br />

j<strong>in</strong>aaghaii<br />

day animals<br />

d<strong>in</strong>e<br />

man<br />

naaldlooshii<br />

animals with<br />

large torsos<br />

tl'ee'naaghaii<br />

night animals<br />

baahadzidi<br />

dangerous<br />

animals<br />

Figure 11.1. Part of the Navajo animal k<strong>in</strong>gdom, derived from a pile sort.<br />

SOURCE: N. Perchonock and O. Werner, ‘‘Navaho Systems of Classification: Some Implications for Ethnoscience,’’<br />

Ethnology, Vol. 8, pp. 229–42. Copyright 1969. Repr<strong>in</strong>ted with permission.<br />

<strong>in</strong>formants to expla<strong>in</strong> why people appear <strong>in</strong> the same pile. This produces a<br />

wealth of <strong>in</strong>formation about the cognitively def<strong>in</strong>ed social structure of a group.<br />

Paired Comparisons<br />

The method of paired comparisons is an alternative way to get rank order<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

of a list of items <strong>in</strong> a doma<strong>in</strong>. Remember, for any set of th<strong>in</strong>gs, there are<br />

n(n–1)/2 pairs of those th<strong>in</strong>gs. Suppose you have a list of five colors: red,<br />

green, yellow, blue, and brown. Figure 11.2 shows the paired comparison test<br />

to f<strong>in</strong>d out an <strong>in</strong>formant’s rank-ordered preference for these five colors.<br />

You might say: ‘‘Here are two animals. Which one is the more ?’’<br />

where the blank is filled <strong>in</strong> by ‘‘vicious,’’ or ‘‘wild,’’ or ‘‘smarter,’’ or some<br />

other descriptor.<br />

You could ask <strong>in</strong>formants to choose the ‘‘illness <strong>in</strong> this pair that is more life<br />

threaten<strong>in</strong>g,’’ or ‘‘the food <strong>in</strong> this pair that is better for you,’’ or ‘‘the crime <strong>in</strong><br />

this pair that you’re most afraid of.’’<br />

I’ve presented the pairs <strong>in</strong> figure 11.2 <strong>in</strong> such a way that you can easily see<br />

how the 10 of them exhausts the possibilities for five items. When you present<br />

a paired comparison test to an <strong>in</strong>formant, be sure to scramble the order of the<br />

pairs to ensure aga<strong>in</strong>st order effects—that is, where someth<strong>in</strong>g about the<br />

order of the items <strong>in</strong> a list <strong>in</strong>fluences the choices that <strong>in</strong>formants make. You<br />

can use Anthropac to do this.<br />

To f<strong>in</strong>d the rank order of the list for each <strong>in</strong>formant, you simply count up<br />

how many times each item <strong>in</strong> a list ‘‘w<strong>in</strong>s’’—that is, how many times it was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!