27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

516 Chapter 17<br />

Do<strong>in</strong>g Cross-Cultural Text-Based <strong>Research</strong><br />

There are five steps <strong>in</strong> do<strong>in</strong>g an HRAF study (Otterbe<strong>in</strong> 1969):<br />

1. State a hypothesis that requires cross-cultural data.<br />

2. Draw a representative sample of the world’s cultures.<br />

3. F<strong>in</strong>d the appropriate OCM codes <strong>in</strong> the sample.<br />

4. Code the variables accord<strong>in</strong>g to whatever conceptual scheme you’ve developed<br />

<strong>in</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g your hypothesis.<br />

5. Run the appropriate statistical tests and see if your hypothesis is confirmed.<br />

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g and Galton’s Problem<br />

In 1889, Edward Tylor gave a paper at the Royal Society <strong>in</strong> London <strong>in</strong><br />

which he tried to relate, among other th<strong>in</strong>gs, marital residence (matrilocal, patrilocal,<br />

etc.) to customs of k<strong>in</strong> avoidance. Francis Galton, asked: ‘‘Weren’t<br />

some of the societies that Mr. Tylor was us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> his analysis related to one<br />

another? Wouldn’t that negate us<strong>in</strong>g them each as an <strong>in</strong>dependent example of<br />

the same variable?’’<br />

This became known as Galton’s Problem. One way to deal with it is to use<br />

the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample of 186 societies (Murdock and White<br />

1969) or the HRAF Probability Sample of 60 societies (HRAF 1967) as your<br />

sample. These samples were developed so that the societies would be <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

of one another, l<strong>in</strong>guistically and culturally.<br />

Another way is to treat the relation between pairs of societies as an <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

variable—that is, to measure how close they are l<strong>in</strong>guistically, culturally,<br />

or geographically—and to use that variable as a predictor of whatever hypothesis<br />

you’re test<strong>in</strong>g (Dow et al. 1984).<br />

Or you can, as Carol and Melv<strong>in</strong> Ember suggest (2001:89), choose a simple<br />

random sample from the societies that are currently described <strong>in</strong> the HRAF<br />

archives. If you choose 60 societies samples at random, you can run your test<br />

on 30 of them and then compare your results to the other 30. If you get the<br />

same answers twice, you can be much more confident about them than if you<br />

get them just once.<br />

Cod<strong>in</strong>g<br />

If a piece of an ethnography is coded as 682, this means that it is about<br />

offenses aga<strong>in</strong>st life. It does not tell you what the offense is. It may be kill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

someone by accidentally sett<strong>in</strong>g fire to their house; it may be pay<strong>in</strong>g a sorcerer<br />

to cast a deadly spell on someone who subsequently dies; it may be a revenge<br />

or honor kill<strong>in</strong>g; or it may be an <strong>in</strong>appropriate act <strong>in</strong> battle. The only way to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!