27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bivariate Analysis: Test<strong>in</strong>g Relations 607<br />

color (which is, at bottom, what the so-called race variable is about <strong>in</strong> the<br />

United States) depends on whether they are a member of a two-parent or a<br />

one-parent family.<br />

And clearly—and I mean absolutely, positively, no-fool<strong>in</strong>g, clearly—be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

black did not cause anyone, not one s<strong>in</strong>gle person, to be part of a s<strong>in</strong>gle-parent<br />

household. Be<strong>in</strong>g a black man <strong>in</strong> the United States, however, means a high<br />

probability of attend<strong>in</strong>g poorly funded schools, and poor school<strong>in</strong>g produces<br />

severe disadvantage <strong>in</strong> the labor market. When men <strong>in</strong> the United States don’t<br />

provide f<strong>in</strong>ancial support, poor women—who have even worse prospects than<br />

men do for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g stable, well-pay<strong>in</strong>g jobs—are likely to turn to welfare.<br />

Historically, welfare systems have punished women who have a live-<strong>in</strong> husband<br />

by lower<strong>in</strong>g the women’s allotments. Some women responded by ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle-parent households and some fraction of African American, s<strong>in</strong>gle-parent<br />

families was, <strong>in</strong> 1997, caused by this sequence of events. There are,<br />

then, several <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g and antecedent variables that l<strong>in</strong>k be<strong>in</strong>g counted<br />

as black by the U.S. Census and be<strong>in</strong>g part of a s<strong>in</strong>gle-parent household. (See<br />

figure 2.4 about <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g and antecedent variables.)<br />

Some of the most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g puzzles about human life <strong>in</strong>volve understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the role of <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g and antecedent variables—and figur<strong>in</strong>g out which<br />

is which. Middle-aged men who dr<strong>in</strong>k at least six cups of coffee a day are<br />

more likely to have a heart attack than are men who don’t dr<strong>in</strong>k coffee at all.<br />

Men who dr<strong>in</strong>k a lot of coffee, however, consume more alcohol, more saturated<br />

fats, and more cholesterol than men who don’t dr<strong>in</strong>k coffee. The heavy<br />

coffee dr<strong>in</strong>kers are less likely to exercise, more likely to smoke, and more<br />

likely to be impatient, aggravated people (the famous Type A personality).<br />

The jury is still out on how all these factors are related, but lots of researchers<br />

are try<strong>in</strong>g to disentangle this problem (Puccio et al. 1990; Ketterer and Maerckle<strong>in</strong><br />

1991; Schwarz et al. 1994; James 1997). (Women’s chances of coronary<br />

disease are unaffected by dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g lots of coffee [Willett et al. 1996].)<br />

Here’s another one. Interethnic marriage often <strong>in</strong>creases when tribal peoples<br />

move from rural villages to cities. One effect of this is that unil<strong>in</strong>eal systems<br />

are under pressure to become bilateral over time (see Feldman 1994;<br />

Clignet 1966). Is it just the lack of prospective mates from one’s own ethnic<br />

group that causes this? Or is there someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>herently unstable about unil<strong>in</strong>eal<br />

k<strong>in</strong>ship systems under urban conditions?<br />

Lambda and the PRE Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />

Table 20.5 is a hypothetical 2 2 table show<strong>in</strong>g the breakdown, by gender,<br />

of adult monol<strong>in</strong>gual Indians and adult bil<strong>in</strong>gual Indian/Spanish speakers <strong>in</strong> a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!