27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

536 Chapter 18<br />

from coyote, <strong>in</strong>dicates that the covert category conta<strong>in</strong>s more than what’s<br />

listed <strong>in</strong> the figure). In a scientific taxonomy, foxes are not <strong>in</strong> the same genus<br />

with dogs and wolves. The latter are <strong>in</strong> the genus Canis, while foxes are <strong>in</strong> the<br />

genus Vulpes. Many speakers of English, however, classify foxes and wolves<br />

<strong>in</strong> the category of ‘‘th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the dog family,’’ or ‘‘can<strong>in</strong>es,’’ and a folk taxonomy<br />

of English animal terms respects that.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>termediate category of ‘‘cat’’ is not covert. How can you tell? As<br />

D’Andrade says, you can say ‘‘Look at that cat!’’ if you’re talk<strong>in</strong>g about a<br />

tiger, but it’s weird to say ‘‘Look at that dog’’ if you’re po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g to a fox, so<br />

‘‘cat’’ is a named <strong>in</strong>termediate category and ‘‘dog’’ isn’t.<br />

Two more th<strong>in</strong>gs about figure 18.5. Note how we use words for generic animals<br />

<strong>in</strong> English that would be at the species level <strong>in</strong> a scientific taxonomy<br />

(wolf, coyote, and dog are all members of the genus Canis, species lupus,<br />

latrans, and familiaris, respectively), and how the species level <strong>in</strong> the folk<br />

taxonomy comprises names for subspecies <strong>in</strong> a scientific taxonomy.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, look at how D’Andrade has placed octopus and snake <strong>in</strong> figure<br />

18.5. The horizontal l<strong>in</strong>es show that D’Andrade has classified these creatures<br />

as nonaffiliated generics. They might be classified as life forms, but, as<br />

D’Andrade po<strong>in</strong>ts out, there are many nonaffiliated generics <strong>in</strong> the ocean,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g clams, lobsters, seahorses, jellyfish, and octopi.<br />

Cultural Doma<strong>in</strong>s and Folk Taxonomies<br />

It was quickly recognized that folk taxonomies could be developed for any<br />

cultural doma<strong>in</strong>, not just for ethnobotanical and ethnozoological knowledge,<br />

and that we use folk taxonomies all the time to order our experience and guide<br />

our behavior.<br />

Take someone to a supermarket—one they’ve never been to before—and<br />

ask them to f<strong>in</strong>d peanut butter. Follow them as they make their way around<br />

the store and get them to talk about what they th<strong>in</strong>k they’re do<strong>in</strong>g. Here’s a<br />

typical response:<br />

Well, let’s see, milk and eggs are over there by that wall, and the meat’s usually<br />

next to that, and the canned goods are k<strong>in</strong>d of <strong>in</strong> the middle, with the soaps and<br />

paper towels and stuff on the other side, so we’ll go right <strong>in</strong> here, <strong>in</strong> the middle.<br />

No, this is the soap aisle, so let’s go over to the right. Sure, here’s the coffee, so<br />

it’s got to be on this aisle or the next, with cans of th<strong>in</strong>gs like ravioli.<br />

Any competent member of U.S. or Canadian culture will f<strong>in</strong>d the peanut<br />

butter <strong>in</strong> a hurry, but not everyth<strong>in</strong>g is so clear. Shredded coconut and walnuts<br />

are often shelved with flour <strong>in</strong> the United States because they are used <strong>in</strong> bak-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!