27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Participant Observation 349<br />

great surprise,’’ says Good, ‘‘I had found among them a way of life that, while<br />

dangerous and harsh, was also filled with camaraderie, compassion, and a<br />

thousand daily lessons <strong>in</strong> communal harmony’’ (Good 1991:ix). Good learned<br />

the language and became a nomadic hunter and gatherer. He was adopted <strong>in</strong>to<br />

a l<strong>in</strong>eage and given a wife. (Good and his wife, Yárima, tried liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />

United States, but after a few years, Yárima returned to the Yanomami.)<br />

Marlene Dobk<strong>in</strong> de Rios did fieldwork <strong>in</strong> Peru and married the son of a<br />

Peruvian folk healer, whose practice she studied (Dobk<strong>in</strong> de Rios 1981). And<br />

Jean Gear<strong>in</strong>g (1995) is another anthropologist who married her closest <strong>in</strong>formant<br />

on the island of St. V<strong>in</strong>cent.<br />

Does go<strong>in</strong>g native mean loss of objectivity? Perhaps, but not necessarily. In<br />

the <strong>in</strong>dustrialized countries of the West—the United States, Canada, Germany,<br />

Australia, Germany, England, France, etc.—we expect immigrants to go<br />

native. We expect them to become fluent <strong>in</strong> the local language, to make sure<br />

that their children become fully acculturated, to participate <strong>in</strong> the economy<br />

and politics of the nation, and so on.<br />

Some fully assimilated immigrants to those countries become anthropologists<br />

and no one questions whether their immigrant background produces a<br />

lack of objectivity. S<strong>in</strong>ce total objectivity is, by def<strong>in</strong>ition, a myth, I’d worry<br />

more about produc<strong>in</strong>g credible data and strong analysis and less about whether<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g native is good or bad.<br />

How Much Time Does It Take?<br />

Anthropological field research traditionally takes a year or more because it<br />

takes that long to get a feel for the full round of people’s lives. It can take that<br />

long just to settle <strong>in</strong>, learn a new language, ga<strong>in</strong> rapport, and be <strong>in</strong> a position<br />

to ask good questions and to get good answers.<br />

A lot of participant observation studies, however, are done <strong>in</strong> a matter of<br />

weeks or a few months. Yu (1995) spent 4 months as a participant observer <strong>in</strong><br />

a family-run Ch<strong>in</strong>ese restaurant, look<strong>in</strong>g at differences <strong>in</strong> the conceptions that<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese and non-Ch<strong>in</strong>ese employees had about th<strong>in</strong>gs like good service, adequate<br />

compensation, and the role of management.<br />

At the extreme low end, it is possible to do useful participant observation<br />

<strong>in</strong> just a few days. Assum<strong>in</strong>g that you’ve wasted as much time <strong>in</strong> laundromats<br />

as I did when I was a student, you could conduct a reasonable participant<br />

observation study of one such place <strong>in</strong> a week. You’d beg<strong>in</strong> by br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a<br />

load of wash and pay<strong>in</strong>g careful attention to what’s go<strong>in</strong>g on around you.<br />

After two or three nights of observation, you’d be ready to tell other patrons<br />

that you were conduct<strong>in</strong>g research and that you’d appreciate their lett<strong>in</strong>g you

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!