27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

788 Subject Index<br />

systematic bias, 55, 111<br />

systematic random sampl<strong>in</strong>g, 151–53<br />

System of Positive Policy (Comte), 13<br />

tabula rasa, 4<br />

Talayesva, Don, 472<br />

talk-<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>teraction, 487<br />

Tambiah, S. J., 355<br />

target item, 336<br />

Tau b . See Kendall’s T b<br />

taxonomic analysis. See folk taxonomies<br />

taxonomic trees, 314<br />

Taylor, Frederick W<strong>in</strong>slow, 17<br />

t distribution, 180–81; critical value, 181<br />

Tearoom Trade Study, 439<br />

telephone <strong>in</strong>terviews, 252; pros and cons,<br />

261–64<br />

tell-me-more probe, 219<br />

test<strong>in</strong>g confound, 115<br />

text analysis, 463–64, 473–521; computers<br />

and, 519–21; discourse analysis,<br />

484–91; hermeneutics, 473–75; narrative<br />

and performance analysis, 475–79;<br />

schema analysis, 479–84. See also<br />

content analysis; grounded theory text<br />

analysis<br />

text collection, 464–65. See also native<br />

ethnography<br />

text management software, 406–7<br />

Tezcatlipoca (Mesoamerican god), 508<br />

TFRs (total fertility rates), 86, 571<br />

themes, 492–95<br />

theoretical perspectives. See paradigms<br />

theoretical saturation, 500–501<br />

theory, 28, 61, 63–66, 78–89; idiographic<br />

theory, 83–84; idiographic vs.<br />

nomothetic, 81–83; nomothetic theory,<br />

84–86; paradigms, 79–81, 86–88<br />

theory notes, 499, 500<br />

th<strong>in</strong>kaloud method, 286–87<br />

third-party-present effect, 242–43<br />

third quartile, 563<br />

Thompson Institute for Scientific Information<br />

(ISI), 98<br />

thought experiments, 128–30<br />

threaten<strong>in</strong>g questions, 243–44<br />

threats to validity, 109; confounds,<br />

114–18<br />

threats to validity, controll<strong>in</strong>g for,<br />

118–28; <strong>in</strong>terrupted time series design,<br />

128, 128; one-group pretest-posttest<br />

design, 125–26, 126; one-shot case<br />

study design, 124, 124–25; posttestonly<br />

design with random assignment,<br />

123, 123–24; Solomon four-group<br />

design, 121, 121–22; two-group posttest-only<br />

design without random<br />

assignment, 126, 126–28; two-group<br />

pretest-posttest design without random<br />

assignment, 122, 122–23; two-group<br />

pretest-posttest design with random<br />

assignment, 118–21, 120<br />

time allocation studies, 425–32; cod<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

431–32; cont<strong>in</strong>uous monitor<strong>in</strong>g, mix<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with, 434–35; reactivity, 426–27;<br />

sampl<strong>in</strong>g, 427–31. See also direct<br />

observation<br />

time budget surveys, 293–95<br />

timel<strong>in</strong>e cues, 249<br />

time sampl<strong>in</strong>g, 425. See also time allocation<br />

studies<br />

topical codes, 399–404<br />

Tosmana (software), 547<br />

total fertility rates (TFRs), 86, 571<br />

total variance, 598, 599, 600<br />

Tozzer Library (Harvard University),<br />

100, 101<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>ed subjectivity, 22<br />

transcribers, 230–31<br />

A Treatise on Man (Quételet), 12<br />

treatment group, 110, 111<br />

triad tests, 307–11; BIB design, 309–11,<br />

310<br />

Trobriand land dispute schema, 481–82<br />

true experiments, 110–13. See also field<br />

experiments; laboratory experiments<br />

Truman, Harry S, 188<br />

t-disribution, 179–81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!