27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

330 Chapter 12<br />

items as you th<strong>in</strong>k you’ll need <strong>in</strong> your f<strong>in</strong>al scale. If you want a scale of, say,<br />

six items, use 25 or 30 items <strong>in</strong> the first test (DeVellis 1991:57).<br />

3. Determ<strong>in</strong>e the type and number of response categories. Some popular response<br />

categories are agree-disagree, favor-oppose, helpful–not helpful, many-none,<br />

like me–not like me, true-untrue, suitable-unsuitable, always-never, and so on.<br />

Most Likert scale items have an odd number of response choices: three, five, or<br />

seven. The idea is to give people a range of choices that <strong>in</strong>cludes a midpo<strong>in</strong>t. The<br />

midpo<strong>in</strong>t usually carries the idea of neutrality—neither agree nor disagree, for<br />

example. An even number of response choices forces <strong>in</strong>formants to ‘‘take a<br />

stand,’’ while an odd number of choices lets <strong>in</strong>formants ‘‘sit on the fence.’’<br />

There is no best format. But if you ever want to comb<strong>in</strong>e responses <strong>in</strong>to just<br />

two categories (yes-no, agree-disagree, like me–not like me), then it’s better<br />

to have an even number of choices. Otherwise, you have to decide whether<br />

the neutral responses get collapsed with the positive answers or the negative<br />

answers—or thrown out as miss<strong>in</strong>g data.<br />

4. Test your item pool on some respondents. Ideally, you need at least 100—or even<br />

200—respondents to test an <strong>in</strong>itial pool of items (Spector 1992:29). This will<br />

ensure that: (1) You capture the full variation <strong>in</strong> responses to all your items; and<br />

(2) The response variability represents the variability <strong>in</strong> the general population<br />

to which you eventually want to apply your scale.<br />

5. Conduct an item analysis to f<strong>in</strong>d the items that form a unidimensional scale of<br />

the variable you’re try<strong>in</strong>g to measure. More on item analysis com<strong>in</strong>g up next.<br />

6. Use your scale <strong>in</strong> your study and run the item analysis aga<strong>in</strong> to make sure that<br />

the scale is hold<strong>in</strong>g up. If the scale does hold up, then look for relations between<br />

the scale scores and the scores of other variables for persons <strong>in</strong> your study.<br />

Item Analysis<br />

This is the key to build<strong>in</strong>g scales. The idea is to f<strong>in</strong>d out which, among the<br />

many items you’re test<strong>in</strong>g, need to be kept and which should be thrown away.<br />

The set of items that you keep should tap a s<strong>in</strong>gle social or psychological<br />

dimension. In other words, the scale should be unidimensional.<br />

In the next few pages, I’m go<strong>in</strong>g to walk through the logic of build<strong>in</strong>g scales<br />

that are unidimensional. Read these pages very carefully. At the end of this<br />

section, I’ll advocate us<strong>in</strong>g factor analysis to do the item analysis quickly,<br />

easily, and reliably. No fair, though, us<strong>in</strong>g factor analysis for scale construction<br />

until you understand the logic of scale construction itself.<br />

There are three steps to do<strong>in</strong>g an item analysis and f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a subset of items<br />

that constitute a unidimensional scale: (1) scor<strong>in</strong>g the items, (2a) tak<strong>in</strong>g the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!