27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

454 Chapter 16<br />

past your editor’s desk. Why not hold anthropologists to the standard that journalists<br />

face every day?<br />

3. Be open to negative evidence rather than annoyed when it pops up. When you<br />

run <strong>in</strong>to a case that doesn’t fit your theory, ask yourself whether it’s the result<br />

of: (a) normal <strong>in</strong>tracultural variation, (b) your lack of knowledge about the<br />

range of appropriate behavior, or (c) a genu<strong>in</strong>ely unusual case.<br />

4. As you come to understand how someth<strong>in</strong>g works, seek out alternative explanations<br />

from key <strong>in</strong>formants and from colleagues, and listen to them carefully.<br />

American folk culture, for example, holds that women left home for the workforce<br />

because of what are widely called ‘‘fem<strong>in</strong>ism’’ and ‘‘women’s liberation.’’<br />

That’s a popular emic explanation. An alternative explanation is that fem<strong>in</strong>ist<br />

values and orientations are supported, if not caused, by women be<strong>in</strong>g driven out<br />

of their homes and <strong>in</strong>to the workforce by the hyper<strong>in</strong>flation dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1970s that<br />

drove down the purchas<strong>in</strong>g power of their husbands’ <strong>in</strong>comes (Margolis 1984).<br />

Both the emic, folk explanation and the etic explanation are <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g for different<br />

reasons.<br />

5. Try to fit extreme cases <strong>in</strong>to your theory, and if the cases won’t fit, don’t be too<br />

quick to throw them out. It is always easier to throw out cases than it is to reexam<strong>in</strong>e<br />

your own ideas, but the easy way out is hardly ever the right way <strong>in</strong><br />

research.<br />

Data Matrices<br />

One of the most important concepts <strong>in</strong> all data analysis—whether we’re<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g with quantitative or qualitative data—is the data matrix. There are<br />

two basic k<strong>in</strong>ds of data matrices: profile matrices and proximity matrices.<br />

Figure 16.1 shows what these two k<strong>in</strong>ds of matrices look like:<br />

Profile Matrices<br />

Across the social sciences, most data analysis is about how properties of<br />

th<strong>in</strong>gs are related to one another. We ask, for example, ‘‘Is the ability to hunt<br />

related to the number of wives a man has?’’ ‘‘Is hav<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dependent source<br />

of <strong>in</strong>come related to women’s total fertility?’’ ‘‘Are remittances from labor<br />

migrants related to the achievement <strong>in</strong> school of children left beh<strong>in</strong>d?’’ ‘‘Is the<br />

per capita gross national product of a nation related to the probability that it<br />

will go to war with its neighbors?’’<br />

This is called profile analysis. You start with series of th<strong>in</strong>gs—units of<br />

analysis—and you measure a series of variables for each of those th<strong>in</strong>gs. This<br />

produces a profile matrix, or, simply, a data matrix. A data matrix is a table<br />

of cases and their associated variables. Each unit of analysis is profiled by a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!