27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

538 Chapter 18<br />

by Frake (1964), Metzger and Williams (1966), and D’Andrade et al. (1972).<br />

Start with the frame:<br />

What k<strong>in</strong>ds of<br />

are there?<br />

where the blank is ‘‘cars,’’ ‘‘trees,’’ ‘‘saddles,’’ ‘‘snow,’’ ‘‘soldiers’’—whatever<br />

you’re <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g. This frame is used aga<strong>in</strong> and aga<strong>in</strong>, until<br />

an <strong>in</strong>formant says that the question is silly.<br />

For example, suppose you asked a native speaker of American English<br />

‘‘What k<strong>in</strong>ds of foods are there?’’ You might get a list like: pasta, meat, fish,<br />

fruits, vegetables, snacks. . . .’’ (You’ll probably get a slightly different set of<br />

labels if you ask a native speaker of British English this same question.)<br />

Next, you ask: ‘‘What k<strong>in</strong>ds of pasta [meats] [fish] [etc.] are there?’’ The<br />

answer for meats might be: beef, lamb, chicken, pork, venison. . . .<br />

So you extend the search: ‘‘What k<strong>in</strong>ds of beef [lamb] [chicken] [etc.] are<br />

there?’’ For some people, at least, you’ll f<strong>in</strong>d that beef is divided <strong>in</strong>to steak,<br />

chops, hamburger, and so on, and that chicken is divided <strong>in</strong>to dark meat and<br />

white meat. But if you ask ‘‘What k<strong>in</strong>ds of steaks are there?’’ you might be<br />

told: ‘‘There are no k<strong>in</strong>ds; they just are what they are.’’ Of course, if you’re<br />

deal<strong>in</strong>g with a real steak lover, you might be told about Porterhouse, T-bone,<br />

rib eye, Delmonico, filet mignon, and so on.<br />

Once you have a list of lexical items <strong>in</strong> a doma<strong>in</strong>, and once you’ve got the<br />

basic divisions down, the next step is to f<strong>in</strong>d out about overlaps. Some foods,<br />

like peanuts, get classified as snacks and as prote<strong>in</strong> sources by different people—or<br />

even by the same person at different times.<br />

The po<strong>in</strong>t is, while the Food and Drug Adm<strong>in</strong>istration may have codified<br />

foods <strong>in</strong> the United States, there is no codified set of folk rules for a taxonomy<br />

of foods <strong>in</strong> American culture. The only way to map this is to construct folk<br />

taxonomies from <strong>in</strong>formation provided by a number of people and to get an<br />

idea of the range of variation and areas of consistency <strong>in</strong> how people th<strong>in</strong>k<br />

about this doma<strong>in</strong>. You can learn about the possible overlaps <strong>in</strong> folk categories<br />

by us<strong>in</strong>g the substitution frames:<br />

Is a k<strong>in</strong>d of ?<br />

Is a part of ?<br />

Once you have a list of terms <strong>in</strong> a doma<strong>in</strong>, and a list of categories, you can<br />

use this substitution frame for all possible comb<strong>in</strong>ations. Are marshmallows a<br />

k<strong>in</strong>d of meat? A k<strong>in</strong>d of fish? A k<strong>in</strong>d of snack? This can get really tedious,<br />

but discover<strong>in</strong>g levels of contrast—that magenta is a k<strong>in</strong>d of red, that<br />

cashews are a k<strong>in</strong>d of nut, that alto is a k<strong>in</strong>d of sax, or that ice cream is a k<strong>in</strong>d

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!