27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

678 Chapter 21<br />

sign, plus or m<strong>in</strong>us), you look at the list and decide what the factor means.An<br />

example should make all this a lot clearer.<br />

Handwerker’s Domestic Activities Scale<br />

Penn Handwerker (1996a, 1998) used factor analysis to test whether the<br />

construct of ‘‘domestic cooperation’’ on Barbados was unidimensional. He<br />

asked a random sample of 428 Barbadian women whether their husband or<br />

boyfriend helped with any of the follow<strong>in</strong>g: cook<strong>in</strong>g, wash<strong>in</strong>g clothes, wash<strong>in</strong>g<br />

dishes, bath<strong>in</strong>g children, tak<strong>in</strong>g children places, and car<strong>in</strong>g for children. To<br />

put these items of domestic cooperation <strong>in</strong> context, he also asked each woman<br />

whether her husband or boyfriend was expected to treat her as an equal and<br />

whether her husband or boyfriend did, <strong>in</strong> fact, treat her as an equal.<br />

Table 21.22 is a schematic of Handwerker’s data matrix. The eight variables<br />

are labeled COOK, WASH, DISH, BATHE, TAKE, CARE, EQUAL1, and<br />

EQUAL2.<br />

TABLE 21.22<br />

Schematic of Handwerker’s Profile Matrix<br />

ID COOK WASH DISH BATH TAKE CARE EQUAL1 EQUAL2<br />

1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0<br />

2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1<br />

3 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0<br />

.<br />

.<br />

.<br />

438 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1<br />

SOURCE: W. P. Handwerker, adapted from ‘‘Construct<strong>in</strong>g Likert Scales: Test<strong>in</strong>g the Validity and Reliability<br />

of S<strong>in</strong>gle Measures of Multidimensional Variables,’’ Cultural <strong>Anthropology</strong> <strong>Method</strong>s Journal, Vol. 8, no. 1, p.<br />

2, 1996a. Repr<strong>in</strong>ted by Permission of Sage Publications.<br />

Table 21.22 is a profile matrix (see figure 16.1a), but factor analysis is done<br />

on a similarity matrix (see figure 16.1b). If Handwerker had asked the women:<br />

‘‘On a scale of 1–5, how much does your husband or boyfriend help you with<br />

the cook<strong>in</strong>g,’’ the entries <strong>in</strong> table 21.22 would have been 1–5. With that k<strong>in</strong>d<br />

of data, a factor analysis program would turn the profile matrix <strong>in</strong>to a similarity<br />

matrix by calculat<strong>in</strong>g Pearson’s r for all possible pairs of columns. But<br />

Handwerker asked the women Yes/No questions (that’s why table 21.22 conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

only 0s and 1s).<br />

One way to turn a 1/0 profile matrix <strong>in</strong>to a similarity matrix is to calculate<br />

the percentage of matches for all possible pairs of columns. That is, when two

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!