27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

668 Chapter 21<br />

English, prior urban experience, <strong>in</strong>ternal vs. external control (feel<strong>in</strong>g that you<br />

do or don’t control what happens to you), and so on. Us<strong>in</strong>g stepwise multiple<br />

regression, Graves and Lave elim<strong>in</strong>ated variables (like English proficiency,<br />

which vanished when they controlled for education) and settled on the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

equation:<br />

STARTING WAGE .87 10 EDUC .08 VT <br />

.13 PW .17 MARSTAT .11 FO<br />

where EDUC is the number of years of education beyond 10 (education only<br />

made a difference <strong>in</strong> start<strong>in</strong>g wage after the 10th year), VT is the level of<br />

vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (skilled, like carpentry, vs. semiskilled, like house pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g),<br />

PW is the highest premigration wage a man earned on the reservation,<br />

MARSTAT is marital status (married or unmarried), and FO is father’s occupation<br />

(whether the migrant’s father was a wage laborer or not—many Navajos<br />

<strong>in</strong> those days were sheep herders).<br />

The equation says: Start with 87 cents an hour (remember, this was the mid-<br />

1960s); add 10 cents an hour for every year of education beyond 10; add 8<br />

cents if the man had strong vocational skills; add 13 cents for each dollar the<br />

man had earned <strong>in</strong> his best job before migrat<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>in</strong> those days, the median<br />

premigration wage was $1.50 an hour), add 17 cents if the man is married, and<br />

add 11 cents if his father had worked for wages.<br />

R 2 for this equation is .54, which means that the equation accounts for 54%<br />

of the variance <strong>in</strong> start<strong>in</strong>g wage.<br />

Now that you know how it works, here are two more examples of multiple<br />

regression. John Poggie (1979) was <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> whether the beliefs of Puerto<br />

Rican fishermen about the causes of success <strong>in</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g were related to their<br />

actual success <strong>in</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g. He measured success by ask<strong>in</strong>g six key <strong>in</strong>formants<br />

to rank 50 fishermen on this variable. S<strong>in</strong>ce his research was exploratory, he<br />

had a wide range of <strong>in</strong>dependent variables, three of which he guessed were<br />

related to fish<strong>in</strong>g success: the fishermen’s expressed orientation toward delay<strong>in</strong>g<br />

gratification (measured with a standard scale), their boat size, and their<br />

years of experience at the trade.<br />

The deferred gratification measure accounted for 15% of the variance <strong>in</strong> the<br />

dependent variable; years of experience accounted for another 10%; and boat<br />

size accounted for 8%. Together, these variables accounted for 33% of the<br />

variance <strong>in</strong> the success variable.<br />

Emmanuel Mwango (1986) studied the decision by farmers <strong>in</strong> Malawi to<br />

devote part of their land to grow<strong>in</strong>g new cash crops (tobacco and hybrid<br />

maize) rather than plant<strong>in</strong>g only the traditional crop, called ‘‘maize of the<br />

ancestors.’’ His units of analysis were <strong>in</strong>dividual farms; his dependent variable<br />

was the ratio of land planted <strong>in</strong> tobacco and hybrid maize to the total land

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!