27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Interview<strong>in</strong>g: Unstructured and Semistructured 245<br />

<strong>in</strong>volves creat<strong>in</strong>g the objective results we want to see. We don’t distort results<br />

to conform to our expectations as much as we make the expectations come<br />

true.<br />

Strictly speak<strong>in</strong>g, then, the expectancy effect is not a response effect at all.<br />

But for fieldworkers, it is an important effect to keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d. If you are study<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a small community, or a neighborhood <strong>in</strong> a city, or a hospital or cl<strong>in</strong>ic for<br />

a year or more, <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g daily with a few key <strong>in</strong>formants, your own behavior<br />

can affect theirs <strong>in</strong> subtle (and not so subtle) ways, and vice versa. Don’t<br />

be surprised if you f<strong>in</strong>d your own behavior chang<strong>in</strong>g over time <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

key <strong>in</strong>formants.<br />

Accuracy<br />

Even when people tell you what they th<strong>in</strong>k is the absolute truth, there is still<br />

the question of whether the <strong>in</strong>formation they give you is accurate.<br />

A lot of research—ethnographic and survey research alike—is about mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

op<strong>in</strong>ions and attitudes. When people tell you that they approve of how<br />

the chief is handl<strong>in</strong>g negotiations for their village’s resettlement, or when they<br />

tell you that they prefer a particular brand of beer to some other brand, they’re<br />

talk<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>in</strong>ternal states. You pretty much have to take their word for such<br />

th<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

But when we ask people to tell us about their actual behavior (How many<br />

times did you take your baby to the cl<strong>in</strong>ic last month? How many times last<br />

year did you visit your mother’s village?), or about their environmental circumstances<br />

(How many hectares of land do you have <strong>in</strong> maize? How many<br />

meters is it from your house to the well?), we can’t just assume <strong>in</strong>formant<br />

accuracy.<br />

We see reports of behavior <strong>in</strong> our local newspapers all the time: College<br />

students today are b<strong>in</strong>ge dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g more than they did 5 years ago. Americans<br />

are go<strong>in</strong>g to church more often than they did a decade ago. In back of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

like these are questions like these:<br />

Circle one answer:<br />

How many times last month did you consume five or more beers or other alcoholic<br />

dr<strong>in</strong>ks <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle day?<br />

Never<br />

Once<br />

Twice<br />

Three times<br />

More than three times

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!