27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

664 Chapter 21<br />

TABLE 21.16<br />

Correlation Matrix for Variables Associated with the Percentage of<br />

Teenage Births <strong>in</strong> the United States<br />

TEENBIRTH INCOME VIOLRATE MVD<br />

TEENBIRTH 1.00<br />

INCOME .700 1.00<br />

VIOLRATE .340 .190 1.00<br />

MVD .778 .662 .245 1.00<br />

deaths (r .778), and that mean <strong>in</strong>come also predicts the rate of motor<br />

vehicle deaths rather well (r .662).<br />

This is a clue about what might be go<strong>in</strong>g on: An antecedent variable, the<br />

level of <strong>in</strong>come, might be responsible for the rate of motor vehicle deaths and<br />

the rate of teenage births. (By the way, did you notice that the strong correlations<br />

above were negative? The greater the mean <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> the state, the lower<br />

the rate of teenage births and the lower the rate of motor vehicle deaths.<br />

Remember, correlations can vary from 1.0 to 1.0 and the strength of the<br />

correlation has noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with its direction.)<br />

And one more th<strong>in</strong>g: The rate of violent crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st people is moderately<br />

correlated with the rate of teenage births (r .340), but is only weakly correlated<br />

with the mean <strong>in</strong>come (r .190) and with the rate of motor vehicle<br />

deaths (r .245).<br />

The task for multiple regression is to see how the <strong>in</strong>dependent variables<br />

predict the dependent variable together. If the correlation between mean per<br />

capita <strong>in</strong>come and the rate of births to teenagers is .700, that means that the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent variable accounts for 49% (.700 2 ) of the variance <strong>in</strong> the dependent<br />

variable. And if the correlation between the rate of violent crimes and the<br />

rate of births to teenagers is .340, then the <strong>in</strong>dependent variable accounts for<br />

11.56% (.340 2 ) of the variance <strong>in</strong> the dependent variable.<br />

We can’t just add these variances-accounted-for together, though, because<br />

the two <strong>in</strong>dependent variables are related to each other—each of the <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

variables accounts for some variance <strong>in</strong> the other.<br />

Table 21.17 shows what the output looks like from SYSTAT when I asked<br />

the program to calculate the multiple correlation, called R, for INCOME and<br />

VIOLRATE with TEENBIRTH as the dependent variable.<br />

Table 21.17 tells us that the regression equation is:<br />

TEENBIRTH 28.096(.006VIOLRATE)(.001INCOME)<br />

For example, the violence rate for Wiscons<strong>in</strong> was 281 crimes per 100,000<br />

residents <strong>in</strong> 1995 and the average <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> Wiscons<strong>in</strong> was $21,184 <strong>in</strong> 1996.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!