27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Univariate Analysis 591<br />

of Shipibo Indian children <strong>in</strong> Peru. They weighed and measured 149 <strong>in</strong>fants,<br />

from newborns to 36 months <strong>in</strong> age.<br />

By convert<strong>in</strong>g all measurements for height and weight to z-scores, they<br />

were able to compare their measurements of the Shipibo babies aga<strong>in</strong>st standards<br />

set by the World Health Organization (Frisancho 1990) for healthy<br />

babies. The result: By the time Shipibo children are 12 months old, 77% of<br />

boys and 42% of girls have z-scores of 2 or more on length-for-age. In other<br />

words, by a year old, Shipibo babies are more than two standard deviations<br />

under the mean for babies who, by this measure, are healthy.<br />

By contrast, only around 10% of Shipibo babies (both sexes) have z-scores<br />

of 2 or worse on weight-for-length. By a year, then, most Shipibo babies<br />

are cl<strong>in</strong>ically stunted but they are not cl<strong>in</strong>ically wasted. This does not mean<br />

that Shipibo babies are small but healthy. Infant mortality is as high as 50%<br />

<strong>in</strong> some villages, and the z-scores on all three measures are similar to scores<br />

found <strong>in</strong> many develop<strong>in</strong>g countries where children suffer from malnutrition.<br />

z-scores do have one disadvantage: They can be downright un<strong>in</strong>tuitive.<br />

Imag<strong>in</strong>e try<strong>in</strong>g to expla<strong>in</strong> to people who have no background <strong>in</strong> statistics why<br />

you are proud of hav<strong>in</strong>g scored a 1.96 on the SAT. Gett<strong>in</strong>g a z-score of 1.96<br />

means that you scored almost two standard deviations above the average and<br />

that only 2.5% of all the people who took the test scored higher than you did.<br />

If you got a z-score of .50 on the SAT, that would mean that about a third<br />

of all test takers scored lower than you did. That’s not too bad, but try expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

why you’re not upset about gett<strong>in</strong>g a m<strong>in</strong>us score on any test.<br />

This is why T-scores (with a capital T—not to be confused with Student’s t)<br />

were <strong>in</strong>vented. The mean of a set of z-scores is always 0 and its standard deviation<br />

is always 1. T-scores are l<strong>in</strong>ear transformations of z-scores. For the SAT<br />

and GRE, the mean is set at 500 and the standard deviation is set at 100. A<br />

score of 400 on these tests, then, is one standard deviation below the mean; a<br />

score of 740 is 2.4 standard deviations above the mean (Friedenberg 1995:85).<br />

The Univariate Chi-Square Test<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, chi-square (often written 2 ) is an important part of univariate analysis.<br />

It is a test of whether the distribution of a series of counts is likely to be<br />

a chance event. The formula for 2 is:<br />

2 (OE)2<br />

Formula 19.10<br />

E<br />

where O represents the observed number of cases and E represents the number<br />

of cases you’d expect, ceteris paribus, or ‘‘all other th<strong>in</strong>gs be<strong>in</strong>g equal.’’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!