27.10.2014 Views

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g Theory 171<br />

In normal distributions—that is, distributions that have a mean of 0 and a<br />

standard deviation of 1—exactly 34.135% of the area under the curve (the<br />

white space between the curve and the basel<strong>in</strong>e) is conta<strong>in</strong>ed between the perpendicular<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e that represents the mean <strong>in</strong> the middle of the curve and the l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

that rises from the basel<strong>in</strong>e at 1 standard deviation above and 1 standard deviation<br />

below the mean.<br />

Appendix B is a table of z-scores, orstandard scores. These scores are<br />

the number of standard deviations from the mean <strong>in</strong> a normal distribution, <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>crements of 1/100th of a standard deviation. For each z-score, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with 0.00 standard deviations (the mean) and on up to 3.09 standard deviations<br />

(on either side of the mean), appendix B shows the percentage of the physical<br />

area under the curve of a normal distribution. That percentage represents the<br />

percentage of cases that fall with<strong>in</strong> any number of standard deviations above<br />

and below the mean <strong>in</strong> a normally distributed set of cases.<br />

We see from appendix B that 34.13% of the area under the curve is one<br />

standard deviation above the mean and another 34.13% is one standard deviation<br />

below the mean. (The reason that this is so is beyond what we can go <strong>in</strong>to<br />

here. For more on this, consult a standard statistics text.) Thus, 68.26% of all<br />

scores <strong>in</strong> a normal distribution fall with<strong>in</strong> one standard deviation of the mean.<br />

We also see from appendix B that 95.44% of all scores <strong>in</strong> a normal distribution<br />

fall with<strong>in</strong> two standard deviations and that 99.7% fall with<strong>in</strong> three standard<br />

deviations.<br />

Look aga<strong>in</strong> at figure 7.1. You can see why so many cases are conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

with<strong>in</strong> 1 sd above and below the mean: The normal curve is tallest and fattest<br />

around the mean and much more of the area under the curve is encompassed<br />

<strong>in</strong> the first sd from the mean than is encompassed between the first and second<br />

sd from the mean.<br />

If 95.44% of the area under a normal curve falls with<strong>in</strong> two standard deviations<br />

from the mean, then exactly 95% should fall with<strong>in</strong> slightly less than<br />

two standard deviations. Appendix B tells us that 1.96 standard deviations<br />

above and below the mean account for 95% of all scores <strong>in</strong> a normal distribution.<br />

And, similarly, 2.58 sd account for 99% of all scores. This, too, is shown<br />

<strong>in</strong> figure 7.1.<br />

The normal distribution is an idealized form. In practice, many variables<br />

are not distributed <strong>in</strong> the perfectly symmetric shape we see <strong>in</strong> figure 7.1. Figure<br />

7.2 shows some other shapes for distributions. Figure 7.2a shows a<br />

bimodal distribution. Suppose the x-axis <strong>in</strong> figure 7.2a is age, and the y-axis<br />

is strength of agreement, on a scale of 1 to 5, to the question ‘‘Did you like<br />

the beer commercial shown dur<strong>in</strong>g the Superbowl yesterday?’’ The bimodal<br />

distribution shows that people <strong>in</strong> their 20s and people <strong>in</strong> their 60s liked the<br />

commercial, but others didn’t.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!